Thanks Jeremy. I will definitely look into autoload, but I suspect the way
we add extensions at startup to all models will make that not work.
On Saturday, April 8, 2023 at 11:34:13 PM UTC-4 Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:01 AM jaso...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>&g
I'll preface this question: We still have to work through upgrading
deprecation warnings so we can upgrade to Sequel 5.0/Ruby 3 (we're on
4.49.0/2.7.3)
The system I work on has numerous postgres databases it connects to (it's a
bit of a monolith). We have servers that only use parts of the sys
Always seems to happen, you find the answer after you've asked the
question. Wasn't available until 5.24 according to github in one of the
release notes.
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 11:16:56 AM UTC-5 jaso...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm adding a text column to a table t
I'm adding a text column to a table that will always be generated by a
function created as immutable. When I create the migration, the
`add_column` method call is not generating the proper `ALTER TABLE` with
the `GENERATED ALWAYS AS`:
add_column :standardized_accno, String, generated_al
Thank you!!
On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 5:56:03 PM UTC-5 Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 2:16 PM jaso...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> I'm experimenting using SQLite with some json APIs. Since there's no
>> out-of-the-box support for json columns,
I'm experimenting using SQLite with some json APIs. Since there's no
out-of-the-box support for json columns, I'm storing loosely-structured
data as json in a Text column using the serialization plugin:
plugin :serialization
serialize_attributes :json. :transaction_data, :other_attributes
This
-4 Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:38 AM jaso...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> I am dealing a good deal of legacy code that is not very friendly to the
>> database with a ton of nested n + 1 calls. I am slowly replacing them with
>> code that takes ad
I am dealing a good deal of legacy code that is not very friendly to the
database with a ton of nested n + 1 calls. I am slowly replacing them with
code that takes advantage of eager associations, nested four levels deep,
which works phenomenally well for this particular use case as each parent
onday, October 19, 2020 at 4:34:29 PM UTC-4 Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:25 PM jaso...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have a situation where I want to set values in a few columns of a bunch
>> of related rows, and write those changes out. I most cases, th
Ok, great, I will see what I can come up with! Thank you!
On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 4:34:29 PM UTC-4 Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 1:25 PM jaso...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have a situation where I want to set values in a few columns of a bunch
&g
I have a situation where I want to set values in a few columns of a bunch
of related rows, and write those changes out. I most cases, the data will
remain unchanged, but I don't want to add a ton of extra logic to prevent
writes.
As an extreme oversimplification, suppose I have an array of ro
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:31 AM jaso...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>>
>> We ran into some code today that did a a `first` without an `order`. I
>> can think of no situation where you don't include an order if you include
>> first (unless you are absolu
We ran into some code today that did a a `first` without an `order`. I can
think of no situation where you don't include an order if you include first
(unless you are absolutely sure there's only one row, for example reloading
a row with eager data).
I want to find a way to raise an error if
13 matches
Mail list logo
