Re: [proposal] Doco

2003-10-27 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Monday, Oct 27, 2003, at 15:35 Europe/Rome, Robert Koberg wrote: nah, dude, look: doco has a very precise editing access point. You can *ONLY* modify xml content. So, changes to .htaccess, CGI scripts, servlet upload, sql injection, cross-site-scripting, and you next favorite attack will NOT wo

RE: [proposal] Doco

2003-10-27 Thread Robert Koberg
> -Original Message- > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:06 AM > To: James Developers List > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lenya- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Sunday, Oct 26, 2003, at 23:33 Europe/Rome, Noel J. Bergman wrote

Re: [proposal] Doco

2003-10-27 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On Sunday, Oct 26, 2003, at 23:33 Europe/Rome, Noel J. Bergman wrote: He's not questioning whether it's encrypted. His point is, doco sends an email to an address, and you respond. It gives very little control, even if there is a compromise. AIUI, the proposed solution would allow "anyone" to e

Re: [PATCH] RemoteDelivery support for multiple delayTimes

2003-10-27 Thread Søren Hilmer
On Friday 24 October 2003 21:47, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Søren, > > We might do some further tweaking, but I think you've got the right idea. > The thought I have is that (down the road) some code might want to accept > messages based upon other criteria, so we might want to enlarge upon our > op