Re: SMTP routes

2003-11-24 Thread Serge Knystautas
Jason Webb wrote: Hmm. I suppose this was what I was getting at. But Qmail and Sendmail both have facilities to setup SMTP routes to deliver to alternate ports and this can't be done using DNS trickery. However, I think a few matcher/mailet tricks will do what I want, so I'll leave it for now.

Re: Independant JavaMail implementation

2003-11-24 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
On 23 Nov 2003, at 19:19, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Define placeholder, please. [There seems to be a lot of code there (117 java files, summing up to 13926 lines of code, just for /javamail/] Interfaces, some comments, very little code. Not functional. ok -- Stefano. smime.p7s Description: S/MIM

Re: CURRENT direction for James :-)

2003-11-24 Thread Darrell DeBoer
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:26 pm, Jason Webb wrote: > I can't remember the outcome of a recent conversation about what happens > to V3 > Will the current head become a branch? > Will the branch_2_1_fcs become the head? > > I would assume that next release will be 2.3 and include the latest > Avalon as

RE: SMTP routes

2003-11-24 Thread Jason Webb
Hmm. I suppose this was what I was getting at. But Qmail and Sendmail both have facilities to setup SMTP routes to deliver to alternate ports and this can't be done using DNS trickery. However, I think a few matcher/mailet tricks will do what I want, so I'll leave it for now. -- Jason > -