Author: noel
Date: Wed Apr 27 20:59:42 2005
New Revision: 165092
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165092&view=rev
Log:
merge minor edits from trunk. includes Mail.setReceipients(Collection)
Modified:
james/server/branches/merge_v2_and_trunk/src/java/org/apache/mailet/Mail.java
ja
Author: noel
Date: Wed Apr 27 20:51:57 2005
New Revision: 165091
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165091&view=rev
Log:
start of merged mailet API. copy over Mailet API from v2 plus RFC2822Headers
from trunk
Added:
james/server/branches/merge_v2_and_trunk/src/java/
james/server/bra
In that case definitely use the IMAP2 proposal as it has a set of JUnit
tests to test the protocol.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 April 2005 16:53
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates
>
> On Wed, 2005-04
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 09:42 +0100, Jason Webb wrote:
> IMHO I'd leave IMAP alone unless you really, really want IMAP.
> NNTP might be a better option as the IMAP code does not persist anything to
> a permanent store so it's useless for most people at the moment.
> However if you just want the proto
POJOs +1
SDI +0
CDI +1
On 4/11/05, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose that work commence to extract James's "value add" IP from classes
> supporting Avalon specific lifecycle attributes, and Avalon component
> dependance, to POJO classes.
> I further propose that these POJO's are d
FYI, I've been not allowing gump build failure
notifications to the listserv since our main trunk was not
in a usable state, but now that there's a push to get that
done, I've allowed gump to start posting its messages
through.
--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech
-
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 April 2005 07:55
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: Mina SMTP implementation updates
>
> For those that are interested, I've updated my Mina based SMTP
> implementation. I've added most of the suggest