svn commit: r165092 - /james/server/branches/merge_v2_and_trunk/src/java/org/apache/mailet/Mail.java /james/server/branches/merge_v2_and_trunk/src/java/org/apache/mailet/MailAddress.java

2005-04-27 Thread noel
Author: noel Date: Wed Apr 27 20:59:42 2005 New Revision: 165092 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165092&view=rev Log: merge minor edits from trunk. includes Mail.setReceipients(Collection) Modified: james/server/branches/merge_v2_and_trunk/src/java/org/apache/mailet/Mail.java ja

svn commit: r165091 - in /james/server/branches/merge_v2_and_trunk/src/java: ./ org/ org/apache/ org/apache/mailet/ org/apache/mailet/Mail.java org/apache/mailet/RFC2822Headers.java org/apache/mailet/

2005-04-27 Thread noel
Author: noel Date: Wed Apr 27 20:51:57 2005 New Revision: 165091 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165091&view=rev Log: start of merged mailet API. copy over Mailet API from v2 plus RFC2822Headers from trunk Added: james/server/branches/merge_v2_and_trunk/src/java/ james/server/bra

RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates

2005-04-27 Thread Jason Webb
In that case definitely use the IMAP2 proposal as it has a set of JUnit tests to test the protocol. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 April 2005 16:53 > To: James Developers List > Subject: RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates > > On Wed, 2005-04

RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates

2005-04-27 Thread Mike Heath
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 09:42 +0100, Jason Webb wrote: > IMHO I'd leave IMAP alone unless you really, really want IMAP. > NNTP might be a better option as the IMAP code does not persist anything to > a permanent store so it's useless for most people at the moment. > However if you just want the proto

Re: [VOTE] POJO pattern

2005-04-27 Thread Alexander Zhukov
POJOs +1 SDI +0 CDI +1 On 4/11/05, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that work commence to extract James's "value add" IP from classes > supporting Avalon specific lifecycle attributes, and Avalon component > dependance, to POJO classes. > I further propose that these POJO's are d

Gump emails coming through

2005-04-27 Thread Serge Knystautas
FYI, I've been not allowing gump build failure notifications to the listserv since our main trunk was not in a usable state, but now that there's a push to get that done, I've allowed gump to start posting its messages through. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech -

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project james-server (in module james-server) failed

2005-04-27 Thread Magic Integration
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates

2005-04-27 Thread Jason Webb
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 April 2005 07:55 > To: server-dev@james.apache.org > Subject: Mina SMTP implementation updates > > For those that are interested, I've updated my Mina based SMTP > implementation. I've added most of the suggest