Moritz Julen wrote:
> I'm Moritz and not a student any more.
> I don't know if it is possbile for me to subscribe to
> a project of 'summer of code'.
Google makes the rules for their participation in the Summer of Code. You
would have to check with them regarding your eligibility.
Regardless o
hello
I'm Moritz and not a student any more. I studied electronics engineer and
graduated in 2000. Then did some hardware development for 4 years. Now I
would like to learn more about the software part of this world. So I feel
like a student in programming. I don't know if it is possbile for me to
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:55:08PM +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > > I have no rights to close jira issues, you can mark as resolved the
> > > following:
> >
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-380
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-379
> > > http://issues.apache.org/j
>>> We've just added some committers to James to incoporate MIME4j
>>> (currently at http://mime4j.sourceforge.net/). Maybe we consider
>>> using that.
>> Absolutely, and develop the rest of the NotJavaMail APIs around it.
>> It looks like these guys know MIME and if there are problems I'm sure
>>
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Answering "550 We don't accept spam" to the "CRLF.CRLF" (end of DATA) will
> be better than 1) because we don't need to send a further mail and better
> that 2) because the sender will know the message won't be handled.
> We should be aware that RFC states that an SMTP se
Chad,
> I'd like to add command capabilitys similar to
> http://www.ezmlm.org/ezman/ezman5.html#ss5.1 EZMLM.
As Daniel mentioned, I wrote a fairly detailed plan for this, which you can
see on the Wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/james/MailingListManager).
If Aaron wants to mentor you, I believe that
Anne,
I was proposing first gaining a conceptual understanding of existing James
configuration, and then developing a model for how it SHOULD be configured.
Currently, JAMES is driven by XML files and Avalon interfaces. What if we
wanted to move configuration into a database or directory service
Anne,
See my other message regarding configuration. It is all up to you what you
wish to propose.
I would like to see SPF support as a further anti-spam aid, but I would also
like to see other things, too. There is so much that can be done with
JAMES. Part of what I really want to come out of
> I would probably configure virtual user mapping within the
> protocol handler, which would allow me to reject unknown
> users in-protocol instead of via bounce notices. But this
> should be a configurable choice, ideally using the same code.
If you run VirtuserTable in the protocol handler
> > > D. SMTP "DATA":
> > > D1. add antivirus/antispam and other content filters and provide
> > > dedicated failure feedback.
>
> > I don't see much benefit to fast-failing after we've
> already accepted
> > the full message
>
> The big win here is not for us, but for the rest of the
> Inte
Danny Angus wrote:
> In my opinion (There may be some disagreement about where we're going
> with this!) Fast Fail is about extending the SMTP protocol to include
> validations
+1
Although the scope of "validation" covers that neccessary to determine that
we will accept the responsibility for de
Nicolas Toper wrote:
> I would be interested in working on clustering for James.
> 1/ What should be the goal of the clustering: high performance
> and/or fault tolerance?
Yes. And another benefit would be that only the protocol handlers need to
be started as root. The rest of JAMES could be r
Serge observed:
> > D. SMTP "DATA":
> > D1. add antivirus/antispam and other content filters
> > and provide dedicated failure feedback.
> I don't see much benefit to fast-failing after we've already
> accepted the full message
The big win here is not for us, but for the rest of the Internet.
Alexander (and others interested in Fast-Fail),
Danny has some information on http://wiki.apache.org/james/FastFail for his
proposal. That is one of several that have come up over the past couple of
years. I just posted mine there, too.
Danny and I are largely in agreement on on having some for
> > 3. Non RFC compliant rejection of messages over size limit,
> and this
> > also screws up the remainder of the SMTP session.
>
> Stefano was working on buffering in SMTP. I don't know and
> haven't looked to see if he got to this one, or if we still
> need a patch.
NO, my patch is only t
> I have seen several projects listed on the Wiki.
Those are some, feel free to propose others.
I came up with another today, which is going through all of JAMES, finding
all of the text strings, replacing the in-line text with the use of property
bundles that use placeholders for the values, thu
Daniel,
I will post today a new nightly build. If you are interested in testing the
new improvements, that'd be great.
> 1. endless remote delivery retries on an exception when remote delivery
> bounces a message
> 2. Error (eg. OutOfMemoryError) at any point in remote delivery causes
> endless
Author: noel
Date: Sat Jun 4 10:21:55 2005
New Revision: 180006
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=180006&view=rev
Log:
First attempt to leverage JavaMail 1.3.2 STMP reply code improvements to better
detect and handle transfer issues. Use true if you want to
diagnose what is happening.
Author: noel
Date: Sat Jun 4 10:20:11 2005
New Revision: 180005
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=180005&view=rev
Log:
Modify JAME's MailetContext.bounce implementation to not include the original
message, and to use the existing MailImpl.bounce() method to generate the
bounce message. Th
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-338?page=all ]
Noel J. Bergman closed JAMES-338:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Upgraded in SVN.
> Upgrade to JavaMail 1.3.2
> -
>
> Key: JAMES-338
> URL: http://issues.apac
Hello,
I am a student in engineering school in computer science (at CNAM in
Paris www.cnam.fr). I work part time as a project lead in a software
company selling ASP services for newsletters. I would be interested in
working on clustering for James.
However before writing a proposal I have a few q
Author: noel
Date: Sat Jun 4 10:05:40 2005
New Revision: 180004
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=180004&view=rev
Log:
add support for fast-fail whitelisting to the new block list support
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/conf/james-config.xml
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/j
Hello,
I am interested in working on James mail server this summer. I have
seen several projects listed on the Wiki.
I am a French student at CNAM (www.cnam.fr) in my last year for an
engineer's degree. I work part time in a software company selling an
emailling software as part of an ASP service
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-375?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-375:
---
Fix Version: 3.0
Resolution: Fixed
> RFC 1854 - Command Pipelining support
> -
>
> Key: JAMES-375
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-377?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-377:
---
Fix Version: 3.0
Resolution: Fixed
> rfc2034 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES compliance
> --
>
> Key: JAMES-377
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-381?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-381:
---
Fix Version: 3.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Configurable RBL support
>
>
> Key: JAMES-381
> URL: http://issue
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-380?page=all ]
Jeff Turner resolved JAMES-380:
---
Resolution: Fixed
> ESMTP Compliance fix
>
>
> Key: JAMES-380
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-380
>
OK, there are many enthusiastic people out there willing to contribute to
James project, so I'm wondering if there is need for more, but still...
My name is Alexander Botov and I'm undergraduate student studying computer
science in Technical University of Sofia, Bulgaria. I've been using James in
28 matches
Mail list logo
