[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-465?page=all ]
Norman Maurer updated JAMES-465:
Attachment: MailFrom-rfc-fix-all.patch
This patch change the behavior to the above descripted.
> Check for valid sender domain in mail from
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-465?page=all ]
Norman Maurer reopened JAMES-465:
-
After rereading rfc a note that if "NO MX record" is found for a domain a
MailServer should try to deliver it to the "A record" of the domain.
So we should c
Should we maybe throw a exception if someone has set
true but has false
set too ?
Otherwise this check cann simple passed by not sending a helo/ehlo at
all.
What you guys think ?
bye
Am Samstag, den 15.04.2006, 18:26 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer:
> I add some logs.. maybe we found something
Serge Knystautas wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I was going to commit this, but wanted to run it by you just since it
> introduces another dependency.
Ugh! Surely this is an optional feature. If people want to use it only then
should they need to add the dependencies.
If and when we move to OSGi, choosing
On 4/20/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> interesting aspect to have a RPC-mailet. maybe this could be done with a
> more generic approach: a mailet which takes as configuration parameters
> a. a jar (hessian.jar, activemq.jar, whatever is neccessary) which it
> loads on its own
> a
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
+++ james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/LinearProcessor.java
// and store it in the next spot
Mail notMail = new MailImpl(mail,newName(mail));
notMail.setRecipients(notRecipients);
+notMa
interesting aspect to have a RPC-mailet. maybe this could be done with a
more generic approach: a mailet which takes as configuration parameters
a. a jar (hessian.jar, activemq.jar, whatever is neccessary) which it
loads on its own
and
b. a class contained within the jar which is instantiated by
+++ james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/LinearProcessor.java
// and store it in the next spot
Mail notMail = new MailImpl(mail,newName(mail));
notMail.setRecipients(notRecipients);
+notMail.setState(mail.getState
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-482:
---
Fix Version: 2.3.0a2
Resolution: Fixed
Added a test and applied the fix.
I decided to change only the linearprocessor because when other code clo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara updated JAMES-482:
--
Version: 2.3.0a1
2.2.0
Priority: Critical (was: Minor)
Increased the priority to critical: this change the way mail processing is done
t
Author: bago
Date: Thu Apr 20 10:19:52 2006
New Revision: 395645
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395645&view=rev
Log:
Test and fix for critical bug (JAMES-482) in linear processor for processors
other than "root" and multiple matchers/mailets.
Thanks to Norman Maurer for reporting it and f
Hello All,
Our 1/2 day tutorial on "Developing command handlers
and fastfail plugins for Apache JAMES" got accepted
for the apache Euro conference.
http://www.eu.apachecon.com/konferenzen/psecom,id,488,track,5,nodeid,,_language,uk.html#session-moh4
Anagha Mudigonda (Myself): I had contributed to f
Write unittests for SPF
---
Key: JAMES-483
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-483
Project: James
Type: Test
Components: SMTPServer
Versions: 2.3.0a1
Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
Assigned to: Stefano Bagnara
Priorit
On 4/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it introduces another dependency.
>
> I'd rather not introduce that dependency. HOWEVER, we have been talking
> about the fact that we have much better support for multiple Mailet
> packages, and I would be +1 to add this to an OPTIONAL ma
I will have a closer look later :-) Thx.
bye
Am Donnerstag, den 20.04.2006, 13:10 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > is it a problem if i use some code fof the current james project ?
> > I must check for subnets etc. This util class does it in a nice way:
> > org/apache/ja
Norman Maurer wrote:
is it a problem if i use some code fof the current james project ?
I must check for subnets etc. This util class does it in a nice way:
org/apache/james/util/NetMatcher.java.
Is there any problem if i put the class also in the SPF package and use
this ?
I would "clone" the
is it a problem if i use some code fof the current james project ?
I must check for subnets etc. This util class does it in a nice way:
org/apache/james/util/NetMatcher.java.
Is there any problem if i put the class also in the SPF package and use
this ?
bye
Am Donnerstag, den 20.04.2006, 10:54 +
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara reassigned JAMES-482:
-
Assign To: Stefano Bagnara
> incorrect state on duplicate mail (LinearProcessor)
> ---
>
> Key
Thats right. Just write the tests. I will start with the SPF Code.
bye
Am Donnerstag, den 20.04.2006, 10:58 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > Yeah,
> > plz write the test. Also what we should do with SPF now ? Rewrite the
> > whole think ? just try to fix the problems ? Ho
Norman Maurer wrote:
Yeah,
plz write the test. Also what we should do with SPF now ? Rewrite the
whole think ? just try to fix the problems ? How you think about it ?
I don't like how it is coded :-(
I didn't check the SPF code, I don't know what it is better to do.
I think this time we should
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=comments#action_12375296 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-482:
---
"t" is the LinearProcessor in that test.
It could be changed so that most of setUp and tearDown code is moved directly
in the tes
That sounds nice :-) I will create my own SPF package based on the
SPFJava. But i will try to rework it to be a bit more "straight
forward" .
thx
Am Donnerstag, den 20.04.2006, 10:51 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> The best way to start would be to write a JUnit test to read this file:
> http://
The best way to start would be to write a JUnit test to read this file:
http://www.schlitt.net/spf/tests/tests_v2.1/test.txt
and be able to run all the tests in java.
If you need help, I can write the basic unitest thing so you can work
directly on the spf code (I could find the time to do this
Yeah,
plz write the test. Also what we should do with SPF now ? Rewrite the
whole think ? just try to fix the problems ? How you think about it ?
I don't like how it is coded :-(
bye
Am Donnerstag, den 20.04.2006, 10:43 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> he test and check
> what the best fix is f
Hi Norman,
if you prefer to work on the SPF side I can write the test and check
what the best fix is for this issue.
Let me know, so we don't work on the same issue :-)
Stefano
Stefano Bagnara (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=comments#action_12375289 ]
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=comments#action_12375292 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-482:
-
I will have a look. Maybe i can write a unit test.
> incorrect state on duplicate mail (LinearProcessor)
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=comments#action_12375291 ]
Bernd Fondermann commented on JAMES-482:
Maybe LinearProcessorTest could be of use for that? Seems like it does set up
mailets and works with them.
> incorrect state
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=comments#action_12375289 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-482:
---
Look at the LinearProcessorTest I wrote to prove JAMES-421.
I'm also not sure about the best of the 2 solutions. Fixing the "dupl
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=comments#action_12375287 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-482:
-
I will have a look but not sure how to write this :-(
> incorrect state on duplicate mail (LinearProcessor)
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482?page=comments#action_12375283 ]
Bernd Fondermann commented on JAMES-482:
it would be great to have a unit test reproducing this.
> incorrect state on duplicate mail (LinearProcessor)
> ---
Am Mittwoch, den 19.04.2006, 20:50 +0100 schrieb Steve Brewin:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 19.04.2006, 12:42 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> > > > i think : org.apache.james.util.mail.spf
> > >
> > > I think org.apache.spf for the main code, and
> > org.apache.james.util.mail.
incorrect state on duplicate mail (LinearProcessor)
---
Key: JAMES-482
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-482
Project: James
Type: Bug
Components: SpoolManager & Processors
Reporter: Norman Maurer
32 matches
Mail list logo
