yeah whould be cool if you could do it... Im not sure how you want
integrate it to the site probaly .
Thx
Norman
Am Mittwoch, den 12.07.2006, 17:27 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
Norman Maurer wrote:
You won't need to do anything with download.cgi. What you need to do is
modify the
Only do give you some more feedback. We run it since yesterday in
production ( as mailrelay ) without problems .
Bye
Norman
Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2006, 22:46 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer:
I just thought you want to slow it down :-D (Just kiddin).. Nice to
know that you run it in postage
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
init(Config) where Config contains a Context that in turn contains a
mean to retrieve services is just an obfuscated way to use the Avalon
serviceLocator pattern (service(ServiceManager s)).
Well, you can say obfuscated and I can say that it is
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
AvalonListserv.java (2 matches)
AvalonListservManager.java (2 matches)
Obsolete and ready to deprecate, IMO.
I love to remove code: can we remove those from trunk?
Wait: deprecate != remove. I'm using AvalonListserv and
AvalonListservManager quite extensively,
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
AvalonListserv.java (2 matches)
AvalonListservManager.java (2 matches)
Obsolete and ready to deprecate, IMO.
I love to remove code: can we remove those from trunk?
Wait: deprecate != remove. I'm using AvalonListserv and
Code review to @deprecate things we already know want to remove in 3.0
--
Key: JAMES-565
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-565
Project: James
Type: Task
Versions: 2.3.0b2
Am Donnerstag, den 13.07.2006, 10:43 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I have a library using slf4j for logging and I want to use it inside my
Avalon based application (Apache James).
We should use java.util.logging, which is also what tomcat switched to
using.
Hi guys,
i want to start with the merge to trunk today. Anyone want me to change
package names or move classes before ? Anyway we could do this also
later.
bye
Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 05:51:22 2006
New Revision: 421607
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421607view=rev
Log:
Start to reorganize packages etc
Added:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/AuthCmdHandler.java
- copied, changed from
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 05:52:52 2006
New Revision: 421608
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421608view=rev
Log:
Start to reorganize packages etc
Added:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/CommandHandler.java
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 05:56:38 2006
New Revision: 421609
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421609view=rev
Log:
Start to reorganize packages etc
Removed:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/AuthCmdHandler.java
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 06:35:33 2006
New Revision: 421624
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421624view=rev
Log:
More reorganize and rename
Added:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/CoreCmdHandlerLoader.java
- copied, changed from
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 06:52:49 2006
New Revision: 421631
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421631view=rev
Log:
Reorganize handlers
Added:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/VrfyCmdHandler.java
- copied, changed from r420985,
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 07:11:04 2006
New Revision: 421637
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421637view=rev
Log:
Reorganize handlers
Added:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/core/filter/CoreFilterCmdHandlerLoader.java
- copied, changed
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 07:31:02 2006
New Revision: 421639
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421639view=rev
Log:
Reorganize handlers
Removed:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/basefilter/
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 07:32:47 2006
New Revision: 421640
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421640view=rev
Log:
Reorganize handlers
Removed:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/java/org/apache/james/smtpserver/VrfyCmdHandler.java
Hi all,
This is a test, I hope it will work because I don't see another simple
solution to move forward from the current stall.
I'm starting this vote because I saw that there is a lot moving around
this issue and we probably currently don't share a common idea, so it's
better to see what
Author: norman
Date: Thu Jul 13 08:10:55 2006
New Revision: 421644
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421644view=rev
Log:
Change config.xml to fit the handler reorganize
Modified:
james/server/sandbox/handlerapi/src/conf/james-config.xml
Modified:
Ok i finished my reorganize of the packages and classes. I think now
the structur is more clearer and cleaner. So plz have a look before i
start mergin it in the current trunk.
thx
Norman
Am Donnerstag, den 13.07.2006, 13:20 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer:
Hi guys,
i want to start with the
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
And now the bulk questions:
A. Deprecate phoenix
-0 in the short term (an year)
A1. Replace it with Plexus (http://plexus.codehaus.org/)
+0 Plexus seems to be actively developed (for maven2) and supports
avalon components and more (must be investigated).
A2.
On 7/13/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This is a test, I hope it will work because I don't see another simple
solution to move forward from the current stall.
It's a vote, not a test, isn't it? ;-)
I'm starting this vote because I saw that there is a lot moving around
You might want to have some discussion on each item before calling for a
vote. In some of these cases, there may be alternatives to the choices you
listed.
Example votes
-1 or +1 are the only meaningful votes at the ASF.
A. Deprecate phoenix
+1 But in what timeframe? I am in no rush.
Stefano wrote:
AvalonListserv.java (2 matches)
AvalonListservManager.java (2 matches)
Obsolete and ready to deprecate, IMO.
I love to remove code: can we remove those from trunk?
Wait: deprecate != remove. I'm using AvalonListserv and
AvalonListservManager quite extensively, and others may
I don't see another simple solution to move forward from the current
stall.
What stall? We're certainly not going to design an API by voting first and
working second.
Meantime, we are making very fine progress on the protocol handler
revisions, which should clear the way to relatively easy
PGP detached sigs for source links 404. to fix s/sources/source/
(i had intended to submit this change as a patch but the documentation on
building and changing the documentation seems a little out of date. i found
the site directory but it isn't clear whether the contents are generated)
-
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
You might want to have some discussion on each item before calling for a
vote. In some of these cases, there may be alternatives to the choices you
listed.
Example votes
-1 or +1 are the only meaningful votes at the ASF.
I think I really well explained what was the
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On 7/13/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This is a test, I hope it will work because I don't see another simple
solution to move forward from the current stall.
It's a vote, not a test, isn't it? ;-)
It is a test because it is not an official
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sure: if we aggree that they should be removed then we should add a
deprecate tag in the current 2.3 release and remove them in our
trunk for the next release.
Have you noticed how slowly Sun *ever* removes deprecated code? I would remove
such optional pieces
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
That said you once said that we could deprecate things in a version and
change them in the following one.
I seem to recall saying that is what a particular large vendor does, and I
wouldn't have much of an issue with it. But if a user raises a concern, I'd
support it
On Jul 12, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
peter royal wrote:
On Jul 12, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
anyone had get it to work to get the slf4j logs logged with
avalon ? I
know there is a wrapper. If it works like aspected we will maybe
switch
to slfj for jSPF ..
30 matches
Mail list logo
