Author: bago
Date: Sat Sep 16 20:10:11 2006
New Revision: 447004
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=447004
Log:
Arrays.hashCode has been introduced in Java 5. I wrote an HashCode calculator
outputstream on the fly.
I did not test my code (Take it as a proof of concept and review it).
Author: bago
Date: Sat Sep 16 20:01:34 2006
New Revision: 447003
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=447003
Log:
Updated pom.xml to use 1.4 for both source version and target version.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/server/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache
Author: bago
Date: Sat Sep 16 19:39:06 2006
New Revision: 447001
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=447001
Log:
More tests for POP3Server (60% => 77% coverage)
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/test/org/apache/james/pop3server/POP3ServerTest.java
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The primary goal is to split release specific and release agnostic docs
and win a website having docs from different releases live peacefully
next to each other, right? That's good.
Yes, but what does this have to do with a Maven repository? Perhaps Stefano
needs to be m
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Stefano,
The primary goal is to split release specific and release agnostic docs
and win a website having docs from different releases live peacefully
next to each other, right? That's good.
Now, if we introduce "server-site" wouldn't we have to create
"-site" as wel
Norman Maurer wrote:
What about the tests for that classes ? Joachim wrote tests using jmock.
This project use a BSD License. So we should be able to include the
tests here.. Any thoughts ?
+1 Include jmock.
There is no big problems in adding license compatible jars used only for
tests. This
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-601?page=comments#action_12435280 ]
Guillermo Grandes commented on JAMES-601:
-
NOTE: All 3 diffs are for:
/james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/James.java
and/or
/james/server/branc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-601?page=all ]
Guillermo Grandes updated JAMES-601:
Attachment: James.java.diff
Missing StackTraceElement in diff, attach the second patch
> Add Class detail in logs of James.Mailet (patch)
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-601?page=all ]
Guillermo Grandes updated JAMES-601:
Attachment: JamesChildsLogger.java.diff
JamesChildsLogger.java.diff is an Add-On to add the static function
getChildLogger, thus it is but easy to add l
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Stefano,
The primary goal is to split release specific and release agnostic
docs and win a website having docs from different releases live
peacefully next to each other, right? That's good.
Now, if we introduce "server-site" wouldn't we have t
Author: norman
Date: Sat Sep 16 15:54:58 2006
New Revision: 446967
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=446967
Log:
Fix problems with getting the right path.
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository/javamail/AbstractJavamailStoreMailRepository.java
Mod
> The primary goal is to split release specific and release agnostic docs
> and win a website having docs from different releases live peacefully
> next to each other, right? That's good.
Yes, but what does this have to do with a Maven repository? Perhaps Stefano
needs to be more clear.
> Docume
Stefano,
The primary goal is to split release specific and release agnostic docs
and win a website having docs from different releases live peacefully
next to each other, right? That's good.
Now, if we introduce "server-site" wouldn't we have to create
"-site" as well for consistency reasons
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
At the moment, I am working on delimiter-based I/O, e.g., the I/O path
buffers until it sees the deliminator (CRLF, CRLF.CRLF, etc.) before
providing the delimited content.
Done.
Now I'm looking at (memory mapped?) files for the CRLF.CRLF terminated
message, as we
> At the moment, I am working on delimiter-based I/O, e.g., the I/O path
> buffers until it sees the deliminator (CRLF, CRLF.CRLF, etc.) before
> providing the delimited content.
Done.
Now I'm looking at (memory mapped?) files for the CRLF.CRLF terminated
message, as well as considering dot stuff
Author: bago
Date: Sat Sep 16 11:21:47 2006
New Revision: 446908
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=446908
Log:
Minor changes to ToMultiRepository and UsersRepositoryAliasingForwarding for
better error reporting and to avoid lookup of not needed services.
Refactored MockMailServer to
Stephan Sann wrote:
Hello!
You love James and designing? And you would like to contribute something
to a tool that makes "life with Yames" more easy? Then please read on...
Please stop crossposting!
This message belongs to server-users *only* (the target is a
web-designer, so maybe not subsc
Hello!
You love James and designing? And you would like to contribute something
to a tool that makes "life with Yames" more easy? Then please read on...
Maybe you read my posting about "yet another James manager"
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/yajamesmanager). It works fine, but to
be honest -
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > you had some time to work on the DataCmdHandler or can share some idea
> > so i can do it. I want to complete it soon.
> I'm starting to do it in my demo code, which I will upload as a proof of
> concept to share the idea in a simpler form, and wi
Author: bago
Date: Sat Sep 16 08:22:47 2006
New Revision: 446884
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=446884
Log:
Fix MockUsersRepository for failing test after previous commit
Commented out unneeded code in James and added a small comment about default
domain users.
Modified:
jame
Author: bago
Date: Sat Sep 16 07:43:53 2006
New Revision: 446879
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=446879
Log:
The previously deprecated JamesMBean is now implemented by LocalUsersRepository
service
Now James.addUser is there only to satisfy the deprecated MailServer.addUser
method
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12435219 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-424:
---
2 comments:
1. Sendmail seems to apply a more intelligent algorithm: it read the mail and
use every line as an header
On 9/16/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Stefano,
>
> Sorry, cannot parse this. You lost me way before you said that -1
> should not be the next version number for James. I feel stupid. You
> are using too much words for me to cope with. Do you have 3 or 4
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12435204 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-424:
-
The Change put the text in the body if there are no valid headers. So this
seems to be the same as Scott Carr reports for
Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Do you agree with one of these 2 plans? Have you, instead, a third
proposal (possibly including expected date to branch/date to release
and
expected feature list)?
As I said, let's go forward with trunk. (Exception: make hotfixes to
2.3 and re
Maybe you should look at Stefanos idea how we can do this. It sounds
easier and cleaner for me...
And yes you are right we need mre junit tests.
bye
Norman
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
+1
(will there be unit tests?)
On 8/28/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the things I'd li
26 matches
Mail list logo
