Author: berndf
Date: Sun Oct 29 02:56:32 2006
New Revision: 468878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468878
Log:
prepare the management features for JAMES-635
Added:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/services/SpoolManager.java
Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
Joachim Draeger wrote:
Am Samstag, den 28.10.2006, 18:07 +0100 schrieb Danny Angus:
On 10/28/06, Joachim Draeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we could use a logical #system name space here like #system.spam
or #system.address-error.
For example this could be mapped
Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
Joachim raeger wrote:
Am Freitag, den 27.10.2006, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
BTW: if everything runs well with Spring, which advantages brings us
staying with phoenix, apart from backward compatibility with custom
code?
+ everyone in the dev team knows
Author: berndf
Date: Sun Oct 29 05:43:44 2006
New Revision: 468903
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468903
Log:
add processor, mailet and matcher management (JAMES-635)
Added:
james/server/trunk/lib/mx4j-jmx.jar
- copied unchanged from r468881,
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-635?page=all ]
Bernd Fondermann updated JAMES-635:
---
Attachment: screenshot_jconsole.png
shows how this feature is looking like in JConsole
Make information about configured Processors, Mailets and
Hi,
I noticed that JMock is causing ant run-unit-tests to fail under JDK
1.4 with the well-known class file has wrong version 49.0, should be 48.0.
Is there an older version of JMock which fits and supports 1.4?
Bernd
-
Hi,
after support for JAMES-635 has been committed to trunk, support in
RemoteManager is still pending.
This is a suggestion what the syntax of new commands could be:
listprocessors
listmailets processorname
listmatchers processorname
showmailetinfo processorname mailet index
showmatcherinfo
Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
Joachim Draeger wrote:
interface MailboxService {
BasicMailboxSession getBasicInboxSession(User user);
/** @param user the authorized User for checking credentials
@param mailboxName a logical/hierarchical mailbox name **/
BasicMailboxSession
Author: berndf
Date: Sun Oct 29 06:20:31 2006
New Revision: 468907
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468907
Log:
ImapHandler whitespaces fixed
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/imapserver/ImapHandler.java
Modified:
I'm pretty sure that jmock 1.1.0 final is compatible with jdk 1.4
Maybe we should simply upgrade...
Stefano
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that JMock is causing ant run-unit-tests to fail under JDK
1.4 with the well-known class file has wrong version 49.0, should be
48.0.
Is there
Author: berndf
Date: Sun Oct 29 06:23:22 2006
New Revision: 468908
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468908
Log:
added traffic level for server-def to 'high'; added mailet-api to list
Modified:
james/project/trunk/src/site/xdoc/mail.xml
Modified:
Looks really cool :-) Awsome work
bye Norman
Bernd Fondermann (JIRA) schrieb:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-635?page=all ]
Bernd Fondermann updated JAMES-635:
---
Attachment: screenshot_jconsole.png
shows how this feature is
Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
db / dbfile / file are already logical mount points.
I don't like it too much because we use this logical mountpoints for
different contents (mailrepository/spoolrepository/generic db access).
I think we should simply rewrite our repository store to provide a
single
On 10/29/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we telling people that the release will be in a week? I could have
posted it on Friday, since Norman, Stefano and I have all reviewed the
packaging (to replace the ones lost in the colo move), and we'd all voted to
release prior to
Why are we telling people that the release will be in a week? I could have
posted it on Friday, since Norman, Stefano and I have all reviewed the
packaging (to replace the ones lost in the colo move), and we'd all voted to
release prior to the packages being lost.
--- Noel
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Why are we telling people that the release will be in a week? I could have
posted it on Friday, since Norman, Stefano and I have all reviewed the
packaging (to replace the ones lost in the colo move), and we'd all voted to
release prior to the packages being lost.
Author: bago
Date: Sun Oct 29 07:37:02 2006
New Revision: 468923
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468923
Log:
Upgraded jmock to 1.1.0 final
Added:
james/server/trunk/tools/lib/jmock-1.1.0.jar (with props)
Removed:
james/server/trunk/tools/lib/jmock-1.1.0RC1.jar
Modified:
Ok, I just upgraded to 1.1.0 final and it seems to work.
Please check this on your side, too!
Thank you,
Stefano
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
I'm pretty sure that jmock 1.1.0 final is compatible with jdk 1.4
Maybe we should simply upgrade...
Stefano
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that
yep, works :-)
thanks,
Bernd
On 10/29/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I just upgraded to 1.1.0 final and it seems to work.
Please check this on your side, too!
Thank you,
Stefano
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
I'm pretty sure that jmock 1.1.0 final is compatible with jdk 1.4
Maybe
Stefano wrote:
After you'll have moved the files to the dist folder, we'll wait a
couple of days for the mirrors to be updated and we'll update the
website to show the release and we'll announce it.
Is this ok?
I have merged the JAMES v2.3.0 release into the release area, cleaned up the
drwxrwxr-x 4 noel noel2048 Oct 26 14:07 server
Fixed, but doesn't explain the problem I had as me. :-)
I modified the README file by hand. Will synch with SVN tonight.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
drwxrwxr-x 4 noel noel2048 Oct 26 14:07 server
Fixed, but doesn't explain the problem I had as me. :-)
I modified the README file by hand. Will synch with SVN tonight.
--- Noel
Cool thx.. Should we update the Site to point to 2.3 as
On 10/27/06, Bernd Fondermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still can't quite believe it but in around 10 working hours I managed
to get James 2.3 up and running - not from Phoenix, but booting using
Spring 2.0. :-)
This is awesome and a huge improvement IMO. Great job! I would be
excited to
Norman Maurer asked:
Should we update the Site to point to 2.3 as best aviable version ?
I believe that was Stefano's plan for after the mirrors had a few days to
catch up.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
24 matches
Mail list logo
