Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
> Joachim Draeger wrote:
>> Am Samstag, den 13.01.2007, 16:30 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
>>> (moving on list from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760)
>>>
>>> TorqueMimeMessage uses a byte arrays for the message bodies and the
>>> MimeMessage is comple
Steve Brewin schrieb:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
>
>> if there's interest, maybe i'll pull together some UML
>>
>
> Get on with it then :)
>
> Cheers
>
> -- Steve
>
>
+1
Norman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> if there's interest, maybe i'll pull together some UML
Get on with it then :)
Cheers
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 1/13/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This could be perfectly done when you are reading the data
> from file
> >> system, as it is planned for the future. The optimal way
> is just passing
> >> over the InputStream, of
On 1/13/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> manage the state more clearly. allow the backend access to more
> information about the conversational state. the parsing layer should
> manage the conversational state but this should be done through an
> inter
Joachim Draeger wrote:
> Sent: 13 January 2007 10:06
> To: 'James Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Sieve integration Was: svn commit: r495746 -
> in/james/server/trunk: ./ lib/ src/conf/ src/java/
> src/java/org/apache/james/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/
> mailets/sr
> c/java/org/apache/james
robert burrell donkin wrote:
manage the state more clearly. allow the backend access to more
information about the conversational state. the parsing layer should
manage the conversational state but this should be done through an
interface. the implementation should be provided by the backend
allo
On 1/13/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Samstag, den 13.01.2007, 10:53 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> > > this is a good example of why i claim that state needs to considered
> > > more carefully. hopefully it may also illustrate why i claim that
> > > session is harmfu
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1/13/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This could be perfectly done when you are reading the data from file
system, as it is planned for the future. The optimal way is just passing
over the InputStream, of course.
AFAIK current JDBC drivers (except or
Am Samstag, den 13.01.2007, 10:53 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> > > this is a good example of why i claim that state needs to considered
> > > more carefully. hopefully it may also illustrate why i claim that
> > > session is harmful.
> >
> > That's not fair. :-( It's just an example for
On 1/13/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Samstag, den 13.01.2007, 16:30 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> (moving on list from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760)
>
> TorqueMimeMessage uses a byte arrays for the message bodies and the
> MimeMessage is completely
Joachim Draeger wrote:
Am Samstag, den 13.01.2007, 16:30 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
(moving on list from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760)
TorqueMimeMessage uses a byte arrays for the message bodies and the
MimeMessage is completely built up before being returned.
this
Am Samstag, den 13.01.2007, 16:30 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> (moving on list from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760)
>
> TorqueMimeMessage uses a byte arrays for the message bodies and the
> MimeMessage is completely built up before being returned.
>
> this is great when
(moving on list from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760)
TorqueMimeMessage uses a byte arrays for the message bodies and the
MimeMessage is completely built up before being returned.
this is great when you want to do mailet processing but is more
resource hungry (when using a protoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464476
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-760:
-
I used to get this one before I increased the memory assign
Joachim Draeger wrote:
I'm not so familiar with the Mailet API and how Mail is handled there.
At the moment Actions awaits a Mail object with a single recipient and
fails if there are more.
Original example seems to split up multiple recipients in a first step
and put them back on the queue. Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464443
]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-760:
-
Please feel free to upgrade derby in trunk..
> ImapServer gives error on l
On 1/13/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i suspect that given good modularization, this choice could be made on
a per-component basis whilst the core remained lowest common
denominator JVM. james would then still run on older JVMs with small
changes to the configuration files
On 1/11/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 11.01.2007, 20:14 + schrieb robert burrell
donkin:
> On 1/11/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 11.01.2007, 18:55 + schrieb robert burrell
> > donkin:
> >
> > > > > > Think of a mb
Am Freitag, den 12.01.2007, 21:55 + schrieb Steve Brewin:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Whoa! Great stuff Joachim!
Well, almost copy&paste from the jSieve samples. :-) But in fact a
server side, user editable, mail sorting is a great feature, I
personally don't want to miss anymore.
(I'm acces
Author: joachim
Date: Sat Jan 13 02:02:56 2007
New Revision: 495863
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=495863
Log:
Untested implementation of the sieve keep command
Modified:
james/server/trunk/src/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/sieve/Actions.java
Modified:
james/serve
On 1/12/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A discussion on the Mailet-api list about annotations has started to
> look at the possibility of requiring java 5 for James.
For what? Are we going to do this for trunk therefore meaning that the only
releasable code will require JSE 5,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464427
]
Joachim Draeger commented on JAMES-760:
---
Cool, DERBY-1732 seems to be fixed in 10.2.2.0, 10.3.0.0.
AFAIK we use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464424
]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-760:
-
Here you go:
12/01/07 17:09:03 INFO imapserver: COMMAND FAILED [null] -
Updating From Source Control
Usrc/test/org/apache/james/mailrepository/MBoxMailRepositoryTest.java
Asrc/test/org/apache/james/mailrepository/testdata
A
25 matches
Mail list logo