I've received lots of spam like this in the past for various email accounts.
I just assume it's a mind f*&k.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Angus
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 10:45 AM
To: james-server-dev
Subject: Fwd: MODERATE
I just got this in the moderation queue, what the Sam Hill is it all
about? I figure it is spam, but what could the goal of the sender be?
If you think the headers might contain a clue I can let it through to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTE
Danny Angus ha scritto:
I just got this in the moderation queue, what the Sam Hill is it all
about? I figure it is spam, but what could the goal of the sender be?
If you think the headers might contain a clue I can let it through to
the list.
I looked at the original mail in the moderation qu
> I just got this in the moderation queue, what the Sam Hill is it all
> about? I figure it is spam, but what could the goal of the sender be?
> > We recommend you to follow the instructions in the attached file in
> > order to keep your computer safe.
Classic attempt to fool you into installing
On 2/7/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2007, 21:25 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> how far is the new fetch implementation from being completed?
Unfortunately I currently stopped working on James.
that's a pity: i was looking forward to seeing yo
On 2/4/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Danny Angus schrieb:
> Maybe we should also include a "NOTICE" file in the builds which
> explains this issue ?
NOTICE is already used for legal issues.
Maybe the README is better, but I would prefer to use config.
On 2/7/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Am Sonntag, den 04.02.2007, 21:47 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
> this refactoring rearranges the code within each ImapCommand to split
> into distinct encode, process and decode phases.
That makes absolutely sense. IMO it
On 2/4/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
there seems to be a rough consensus in favour of modularising james.
i've pulled together a document about one possible design
(http://wiki.apache.org/james/Development/Modularisation). this is
just one possible direction but this propos
robert burrell donkin schrieb:
> On 2/4/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Norman Maurer wrote:
>> > Danny Angus schrieb:
>
>
>
>> > Maybe we should also include a "NOTICE" file in the builds which
>> > explains this issue ?
>>
>> NOTICE is already used for legal issues.
>> Maybe th
robert burrell donkin schrieb:
> On 2/7/07, Joachim Draeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Am Sonntag, den 04.02.2007, 21:47 + schrieb robert burrell donkin:
>>
>> > this refactoring rearranges the code within each ImapCommand to split
>> > into distinct encode, process and deco
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
put the same content:
* in the README
* in the config.xml
* in the RELEASE_NOTES
* in the download advertising
* in the announcement
- robert
It whould be nice if someone with better english "knowledge" could
propose the text.
FYI I filed a JIRA issue and assigned
I'll do it, when is the last date?
On 2/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Norman Maurer ha scritto:
>> put the same content:
>> * in the README
>> * in the config.xml
>> * in the RELEASE_NOTES
>> * in the download advertising
>> * in the announcement
>>
>> - robert
>
> It whould b
On 2/8/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Classic attempt to fool you into installing malware.
For a highly paid IT professional I can certainly be pretty bloody dumb, eh?!
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
13 matches
Mail list logo
