Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Søren Hilmer
+1 I really think this next-minor/next-major stuff has added confusion. -- Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt. wideTrailPhone: +45 25481225 Pilevænget 41Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DK-8961 Allingåbro Web: www.widetrail.dk On Tue, July 31, 2007 10:00, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > t

Re: svn commit: r561544 - in /james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/src/main: config/ java/org/apache/james/container/spring/lifecycle/

2007-07-31 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Stefano Bagnara wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Author: berndf Date: Tue Jul 31 14:09:31 2007 New Revision: 561544 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561544 Log: switch from BeanFactoryPostProcessor to BeanPostProcessor. This is for mimmicking Avalon lifecycle correctly: Do a

Re: svn commit: r561544 - in /james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/src/main: config/ java/org/apache/james/container/spring/lifecycle/

2007-07-31 Thread Bernd Fondermann
ok, this could simplify things. thanks for the hint. Bernd Stefano Bagnara wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Author: berndf Date: Tue Jul 31 14:09:31 2007 New Revision: 561544 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561544 Log: switch from BeanFactoryPostProcessor to BeanPostProce

Re: DNSServer usage in AbstractJamesService.configure()

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > Booting the server is getting really far now. In fact, the server comes > up (with some tweaking). > > That's been a big step forward. > > Bernd Cool! Having a spring based deployment will really help most java developers that never heard of avalon/phoenix and w

Re: svn commit: r561339 - /james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/imap/

2007-07-31 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Just a hint: JUnit does not run test classes which are declared abstract. This saves me the headache of coming up with new class names. ;-) Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jul 31 07:22:39 2007 New Revision: 561339 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=56133

Re: svn commit: r561544 - in /james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/src/main: config/ java/org/apache/james/container/spring/lifecycle/

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Author: berndf > Date: Tue Jul 31 14:09:31 2007 > New Revision: 561544 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561544 > Log: > switch from BeanFactoryPostProcessor to BeanPostProcessor. This is for > mimmicking Avalon lifecycle correctly: Do a complete l

Re: DNSServer usage in AbstractJamesService.configure()

2007-07-31 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Bernd Fondermann wrote: Stefano, Thanks for your comment! I just debugged James(Phoenix) and was very surprised to find that the lifecycle calling sequence is traversing deep (all lifecycle methods for one component, then for the second) instead of calling one lifecycle method for all component

Re: Roadmap? Or maybe not... [WAS Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0]

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 7/31/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > > IMHO it worth specifying that this is not the panacea because this means that backward incompatible changes in core stuff will not be supported unl

svn commit: r561544 - in /james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/src/main: config/ java/org/apache/james/container/spring/lifecycle/

2007-07-31 Thread berndf
Author: berndf Date: Tue Jul 31 14:09:31 2007 New Revision: 561544 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561544 Log: switch from BeanFactoryPostProcessor to BeanPostProcessor. This is for mimmicking Avalon lifecycle correctly: Do a complete lifecycle for one bean/component, only then go

svn commit: r561535 - in /james/server/sandbox/spring-integration: build.xml src/main/config/james-config.xml src/main/config/james-fetchmail.xml src/main/config/james-smtphandlerchain.xml src/main/co

2007-07-31 Thread berndf
Author: berndf Date: Tue Jul 31 14:05:06 2007 New Revision: 561535 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561535 Log: use more current config files Modified: james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/build.xml james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/src/main/config/james-config.xml

svn commit: r561519 - /james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/src/main/java/org/apache/james/container/spring/processor/

2007-07-31 Thread berndf
Author: berndf Date: Tue Jul 31 13:53:46 2007 New Revision: 561519 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561519 Log: Processors are replaced by Propagators and thus are removed Removed: james/server/sandbox/spring-integration/src/main/java/org/apache/james/container/spring/processor

Re: jSPF issues status update

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
norman ha scritto: > Am Montag, den 30.07.2007, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: >> After 40 days SPF team finally fixed the spf test suite: >> http://www.openspf.org/source/project/test-suite/rfc4408-tests.yml?rev=90&r1=88&r2=90 >> >> This was the only thing that made current jSPF trunk non-co

Re: ext directory [WAS Re: Imap Function]

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 7/31/07, norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Paulo, >> >> I think it whould be enough to put the jars >> in /path/to/james/apps/james/SAR-INF/lib/ directory ( You need to create >> the lib after james was started once) > > IMHO it would be useful to have

Re: ext directory [WAS Re: Imap Function]

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/07, Paulo Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/31/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 7/31/07, norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Paulo, > > > > > > I think it whould be enough to put the jars > > > in /path/to/james/apps/james/SAR-INF/lib/ directory

Re: ext directory [WAS Re: Imap Function]

2007-07-31 Thread Paulo Sergio
On 7/31/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/31/07, norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Paulo, > > > > I think it whould be enough to put the jars > > in /path/to/james/apps/james/SAR-INF/lib/ directory ( You need to create > > the lib after james was started once) > >

ext directory [WAS Re: Imap Function]

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/07, norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Paulo, > > I think it whould be enough to put the jars > in /path/to/james/apps/james/SAR-INF/lib/ directory ( You need to create > the lib after james was started once) IMHO it would be useful to have an extensions directory whose contents would

Roadmap? Or maybe not... [WAS Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0]

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > >> IMHO it worth specifying that this is not the panacea because this means > >> that backward incompatible changes in core stuff will not be supported > >> unless you clone all of the modules. > > > > t

Re: jSPF issues status update

2007-07-31 Thread norman
Am Montag, den 30.07.2007, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > After 40 days SPF team finally fixed the spf test suite: > http://www.openspf.org/source/project/test-suite/rfc4408-tests.yml?rev=90&r1=88&r2=90 > > This was the only thing that made current jSPF trunk non-compliant > (well, the fac

Re: Imap Function

2007-07-31 Thread norman
Hi Paulo, I think it whould be enough to put the jars in /path/to/james/apps/james/SAR-INF/lib/ directory ( You need to create the lib after james was started once) bye Norman Am Dienstag, den 31.07.2007, 17:29 +0100 schrieb Paulo Sergio: > Thanks for the fast answer.. it is working now ! > i'm

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread norman
Am Dienstag, den 31.07.2007, 10:05 + schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: > On 7/31/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > > trunk has been dubbed 'next-major' for a long time now. a lot of extra > > > function has been added to trunk and though a ful

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread norman
> -- 8< > [x] +1 Dub trunk 'JAMES 3.0' > [ ] +0 Sounds reasonable > [ ] -0 Sounds unreasonable > [ ] -1 Find another name > -- > Thx for all your efforts. Bye Norman

Re: Imap Function

2007-07-31 Thread Paulo Sergio
Thanks for the fast answer.. it is working now ! i'm now trying to add a web service client to imap function (this web service will be the repository). the problem are the jars needed to the web service, should the jars be inside the function jar or should they be placed and imported from the stage

Re: Imap Function

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/07, Paulo Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, hi paulo > I'm trying to build james server only with Imap support i've already removed > pop3, nntp, fetchmail and smtp (i will use also a remote repository). > I've removed the entries related with the removed items from > james-asse

Imap Function

2007-07-31 Thread Paulo Sergio
Hi all, I'm trying to build james server only with Imap support i've already removed pop3, nntp, fetchmail and smtp (i will use also a remote repository). I've removed the entries related with the removed items from james-assembly.xml, i also update james-comnfig.xml accordingly, but i'm having som

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > in terms of storage/configuration compatibility: > > 1 i don't believe that a decision needs to be taken now and would be > better taken later against a concrete proposal > 2 i believe that development on most proposals could be done without > the need to break

svn commit: r561339 - /james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/imap/

2007-07-31 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jul 31 07:22:39 2007 New Revision: 561339 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561339 Log: Stop superclass being run as a test. Added: james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/imap/SimpleScriptedTest

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > i would prefer the storage/config compatibility issue to be managed by > > experimental modules. this means that people can code whatever new > > features without having to wait for some future next-major

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Serge Knystautas
On 7/31/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- 8< > [x] +1 Dub trunk 'JAMES 3.0' -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

svn commit: r561318 - /james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/imap/

2007-07-31 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jul 31 05:58:35 2007 New Revision: 561318 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561318 Log: Ported functional tests from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/tags/pre-v2and3-merger-trunk/proposals/imap2. Added: james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-

svn commit: r561317 - /james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/

2007-07-31 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jul 31 05:58:17 2007 New Revision: 561317 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561317 Log: Preparing to port functional tests. Added: james/server/trunk/experimental-seda-imap-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/ -

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > i would prefer the storage/config compatibility issue to be managed by > experimental modules. this means that people can code whatever new > features without having to wait for some future next-major to be cut. I read this as 3.0 *will* *be* backward compatible

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Bernd Fondermann
[ X] +1 Dub trunk 'JAMES 3.0' Bernd - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > trunk has been dubbed 'next-major' for a long time now. a lot of extra > > function has been added to trunk and though a full release is > > definitely a long way in the future, the time seems right now t

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > >> [X] +1 Dub trunk 'JAMES 3.0' > > > > +1 for JAMES Server 3.0 -SNAPSHOT (or -dev). > > > > JAMES is the project name > > Server is the product name > > 3.0 will be a final/stable release. -dev or -SNAPSHOT (I p

svn commit: r561282 - in /james/server/sandbox/imap-functional/src/test/java/org/apache/james: imapserver/ imapserver/concurrent/ test/ test/functional/ test/functional/imap/ test/functional/imap/scri

2007-07-31 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jul 31 02:31:41 2007 New Revision: 561282 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561282 Log: Repackaged. Converted test suites to recommendations. Added: james/server/sandbox/imap-functional/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/functional/ james/server/s

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: >> [X] +1 Dub trunk 'JAMES 3.0' > > +1 for JAMES Server 3.0 -SNAPSHOT (or -dev). > > JAMES is the project name > Server is the product name > 3.0 will be a final/stable release. -dev or -SNAPSHOT (I prefer the > -SNAPSHOT) is more appropriate for nightly builds/snapsho

Re: [VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > trunk has been dubbed 'next-major' for a long time now. a lot of extra > function has been added to trunk and though a full release is > definitely a long way in the future, the time seems right now to > decide that a future release from this code stream will be

svn commit: r561266 - in /james/server/sandbox/imap-functional/src: main/java/ test/java/org/apache/james/imapserver/ test/java/org/apache/james/test/

2007-07-31 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jul 31 01:40:44 2007 New Revision: 561266 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=561266 Log: Factor out dependency on IMAP implementation. Added: james/server/sandbox/imap-functional/src/test/java/org/apache/james/test/HostSystem.java Removed: james/serv

Re: LICENSE file issue

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/30/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > > Thanks for the heads-up. > > Do we need a JIRA for this? > > Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-797 > > Please, someone, update JIRA versions to remove next-major (as if I > understood the new p

[VOTE] next-major from trunk will be 3.0

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
trunk has been dubbed 'next-major' for a long time now. a lot of extra function has been added to trunk and though a full release is definitely a long way in the future, the time seems right now to decide that a future release from this code stream will be designated 3.0. dubbing trunk 3.0 does im

[jira] Commented: (JAMES-134) Large emails in the spool cause SpoolManager to throw OutOfMemoryError

2007-07-31 Thread Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516641 ] Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-134: --- Currently there is not a complete solution, but the scenario is a bit i

Re: [POLL] James 3.0 Milestone 1...?

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the milestone would be an official release but just a technology > preview with no guarantees about compatibility with the actual 3 > series releases (whenever they happen). responses to the POLL: +1 Timothy Collett +1 Paulo Sergio

Re: torque mailbox frequent deadlocks

2007-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/30/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i've been going though the logs to find out why fetchpop->sieve->IMAP > hasn't been filtering mail incorrectly even though jsieve is working > very well for me. > > one problem turns out to be that concurrent access to the torque > mail