To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-server has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon Dec 3 13:12:18 2007
New Revision: 600691
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600691&view=rev
Log:
Consolidate into single wrapper.
Added:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/wrapper/ImapMailboxWrapper.java
- copied,
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon Dec 3 12:47:41 2007
New Revision: 600680
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600680&view=rev
Log:
No real need for ImapMailboxSession to implementation MailboxListener
Modified:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/mailbox
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon Dec 3 12:07:32 2007
New Revision: 600653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=600653&view=rev
Log:
Removed session interfaces. Only one instance per mailbox means that session
data will need to be passed in.
Removed:
james/server/trunk/core-library/src/main/java/
On Dec 1, 2007 7:44 PM, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The original and simple idea of using JMS as a means to inject Mail
> into James' processors seems good to me, it would open up James to the
> JEE audience. I was about to embark on the exact same experiment, so
> thanks Robert.
t
On Dec 3, 2007 4:04 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danny Angus wrote:
>
> > I agree, but the message body should be a serialised Mail and not a
> > Message to keep things simple.
it's not necessary to specify the message format. it's sufficient that
the implementor of the MailBui
Danny Angus wrote:
> I agree, but the message body should be a serialised Mail and not a
> Message to keep things simple.
I don't know that the message needs to be a serialized Mail as opposed to some
other text format, to make things easier (a goal of Robert's) -- the key is
that we need the e
I agree, but the message body should be a serialised Mail and not a
Message to keep things simple.
d.
On 01/12/2007, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The original and simple idea of using JMS as a means to inject Mail
> into James' processors seems good to me, it would open up James to
