I agree, but the message body should be a serialised Mail and not a Message to keep things simple.
d. On 01/12/2007, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The original and simple idea of using JMS as a means to inject Mail > into James' processors seems good to me, it would open up James to the > JEE audience. I was about to embark on the exact same experiment, so > thanks Robert. > > The source of the message can be the James SMTP service, Fetchmail or > any number of other things and internal Mail processing downstream is > unaffected. This introduces a break between the mail source and the > mail processing, which surely is a good thing? > > rgds, tim > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
