Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun May 4 00:02:31 2008
New Revision: 653185
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653185&view=rev
Log:
Removed unnecessary dependency on MailImpl
Modified:
james/server/trunk/spoolmanager-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/LogMessage.java
Modif
On Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > i think that it would be a good plan to pull out those mailets which
> > are conceptually independent into separate a subproject (standard
> > mailets, say)
>
> I did some homew
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun May 4 00:07:00 2008
New Revision: 653186
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653186&view=rev
Log:
LogMessage no longer depends on core. Now free to move into standard mailets.
Added:
james/mailet/standard/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/Log
On Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> i think that it would be a good plan to pull out those mailets which
> > are conceptually independent into separate a subproject (standard
> > mailets, say)
>
> I did some homework
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
On Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > i think that it would be a good plan to pull out those mailets which
> > are conceptually independent into separate a subproject (standard
> > mailets, say)
>
> I did some homew
On Sat, Feb 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > i think that it would be a good plan to pull out those mailets which
> > are conceptually independent into separate a subproject (standard
> > mailets, say)
>
> I did some homew
i've posted a call for feedback on the mailet-api/mailet-base split to
the mailets list. we also need to understand whether a new release
would be able to act as drop-in replacement for the latest release.
anyone like to volunteer to create a report highlighting the
differences between the separat
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >> That sort of thinking led Stefano to push to rush out v2.3.0 over my
> >> objections that there was a critical memory leak.
> > This is an obvious attempt to dis
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > > The proposal is based on the fact that every message delivered to the
> zone
> > > will be disposable spam. Therefore, unlike performing some sort of faux
> >
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what I propose is that we setup a JAMES zone, and start to deploy JAMES
> in that zone. That will be published in the DNS, and quite shortly we
> should start to see a lot of connections coming to it as millions of
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See above regarding Postage. And keep in mind that I've used Postal and
> > Rabid for isolated testing in the past, but it (too) is not s
My posts are showing up in the archive, but aren't coming back to me. I
can see other people's posts, but not mine.
*sigh*
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James,
I think thats the default behaviour of the list software.
Greetings,
Sascha
James D Carroll schrieb:
My posts are showing up in the archive, but aren't coming back to me.
I can see other people's posts, but not mine.
*sigh*
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
