Re: Something new about a release?

On 7/24/08, Toni Lamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there anything new regarding a relase (of any type) for James ? What type of release were you looking for? And from which codestream? > Last time I asked about a release was more than one year ago, and the main > problem seemed to be the con

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

On 7/25/08, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> the current Nightly Build stuff is under control of Noel >> and we have no way to tune or make better investigations >> there. > > Yes, and I am happy to provide that service to the greater JAMES community. > Was there a Thank You in there s

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 22:33 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > > the current Nightly Build stuff is under control of Noel > > and we have no way to tune or make better investigations > > there. > > Yes, and I am happy to provide that service to the greater JAMES community. > Was there a Tha

RE: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

> the current Nightly Build stuff is under control of Noel > and we have no way to tune or make better investigations > there. Yes, and I am happy to provide that service to the greater JAMES community. Was there a Thank You in there somewhere, or just your usual complaining behavior? > We don't

Something new about a release?

Is there anything new regarding a relase (of any type) for James ? Last time I asked about a release was more than one year ago, and the main problem seemed to be the consensus :(. Doesn't Apache.org have solutions for such "pat(stalemate)" situations? Thnx. -- View this message in context:

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

> +1 It's cool to have an active infra member in the team! :-) +1, > PS: "all agree" ??? Be serious, we are JAMES PMC! Reaching a majority > agreement is a better goal ;-) Lol. d. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Norman Maurer wrote: >> >> Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: >>> >>> Norman Maurer ha scritto: Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > >

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 14:18 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Bernd Fondermann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Norman Maurer wrote: > >> > >> Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > >>> > >>> Norman Maurer ha scritto: >

[jira] Commented: (MIME4J-60) Configurable strategy for line delimiters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616447#action_12616447 ] Stefano Bagnara commented on MIME4J-60: --- This is from an only 3 days old message in th

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

Norman Maurer wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Norman Maurer ha scritto: Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: I have no more my CI machine active so I don't know if I can reproduce this somewhere else. Few weeks ago I ask

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

Norman Maurer ha scritto: Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Norman Maurer ha scritto: Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: I have no more my CI machine active so I don't know if I can reproduce this somewhere else. Few weeks ago

[jira] Commented: (MIME4J-60) Configurable strategy for line delimiters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616379#action_12616379 ] Stefano Bagnara commented on MIME4J-60: --- OK. I agree on "The patch adds extra processi

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

Hi, On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can take care of this if all agree.. I'm happy to help if you need an extra pair of hands. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:52 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer: > Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > > Norman Maurer ha scritto: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > > >> I have no more my CI machine active so I don't know

Re: JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Norman Maurer ha scritto: > > Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > >> I have no more my CI machine active so I don't know if I can reproduce > >> this somewhere else. Few weeks ago I asked if any

JAMES and CI (Was: Server's test failure and CI)

Norman Maurer ha scritto: Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: I have no more my CI machine active so I don't know if I can reproduce this somewhere else. Few weeks ago I asked if anyone knows if JAMES is entitled in asking some resource in ASF machines to use hud

[jira] Commented: (MIME4J-65) Message.writeTo for an rfc822 part ignoring a "base64" encoding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12616371#action_12616371 ] Stefano Bagnara commented on MIME4J-65: --- "A single stage encoder should always be more

Re: Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 10:04 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > JAMES Nightly Build System ha scritto: > > An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to > > http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ > > > > An

Server's test failure and CI (Was: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report)

JAMES Nightly Build System ha scritto: An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below: [junit] Tests run: 6

svn commit: r679294 - /james/server/trunk/mailets-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/transport/remotedeliverytester/AbstractRemoteDeliveryTest.java

Author: bago Date: Thu Jul 24 00:58:51 2008 New Revision: 679294 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=679294&view=rev Log: Remove the testMulti from the RemoteDelivery test suite. I'm not sure this is the failure, but I can guess it (it is far more complicate than the other tests) Modified:

svn commit: r679293 - in /james/server/trunk/mailets-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/transport/remotedeliverytester: Tester.java TesterMailetConfig.java

Author: bago Date: Thu Jul 24 00:57:39 2008 New Revision: 679293 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=679293&view=rev Log: Translated some italian comments I left by mistake. Modified: james/server/trunk/mailets-function/src/test/java/org/apache/james/transport/remotedeliverytester/Tester.j

JAMES Server Nightly Build Report

An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below: [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8