On 8/7/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> most people know that a long standing goal of mine has been to create
>> independent lightweight protocol components (eg no avalon) that are
>> used by JAMES but can also be used by other application. i thi
On 8/7/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> most people know that a long standing goal of mine has been to create
>> independent lightweight protocol components (eg no avalon) that are
>> used by JAMES but can also be used by other application. i thi
On 8/7/08, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritt
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project james-jsieve has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Aug 7 13:40:04 2008
New Revision: 683710
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683710&view=rev
Log:
Added util to base layer of build
Added:
james/server/trunk/build-tools/base-build.xml
- copied, changed from r683338,
james/server/trunk/build-tools/api-build
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMA
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 19:53, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Bernd Fondermann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Moving protocol related stuff into server-independent components will
>> soon raise technical questions:
>>
>> 1. What _is_ the '
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>>
The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good
f
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving protocol related stuff into server-independent components will
> soon raise technical questions:
>
> 1. What _is_ the 'protocol' domain?
> 2. How does this domain interface with the rest of the system it is dep
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ATM I would
> prefer to have a structure similar to mailet. So:
> /james/protocols
> /smtp
>/branches
>/tags
>/trunk
> /pop3
>/branches
>/tags
>/trunk
> /imap
>/branches
>/tags
>/t
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -0 for moving them out of trunk now. I would prefer if you start this work
> inside trunk extracting the code to modules first and once we have modules
> that satisfy us and are self contained we can start single votes to
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
>
> Robert Burrell Donkin
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
most people know that a long standing goal of mine has been to create
independent lightweight protocol components (eg no avalon) that are
used by JAMES but can also be used by other application. i think
separate independent protocol components will have the follo
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
i've run into a few problems building and staging the main site as per
http://svn.apache.org/r
Author: bago
Date: Thu Aug 7 06:43:18 2008
New Revision: 683616
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683616&view=rev
Log:
update minotaur=>people url for maven-skin
make project to depend on release 1.2 skin and not the internal snapshot.
Modified:
james/project/trunk/maven-skin/pom.xml
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 22:06, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> most people know that a long standing goal of mine has been to create
> independent lightweight protocol components (eg no avalon) that are
> used by JAMES but can also be used by other application.
+1, this general d
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm looking here:
https
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose that we introduce a new kind (or two) of module at the same
level
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good
for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the
difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script.
That is correct. We have a CI at the ASF. The nightly
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good
for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the
difference between a real CI environment and
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
[...]
Here is an updated summary of what are our current proposed solutions:
A) vote down MIME4J-51 and revert the code change.
+ least surprise
+ no upgrading effort required
* pars
Author: bago
Date: Thu Aug 7 02:50:28 2008
New Revision: 683569
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683569&view=rev
Log:
Hudson and rat complained I forgot the license in the overview.html ;-)
Good job guys.
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/javadoc/overview.html
Modified: james/mime4
Author: bago
Date: Thu Aug 7 02:40:43 2008
New Revision: 683566
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683566&view=rev
Log:
Add an overview for the apidocs including links to MimeStreamParser and Message
classes (MIME4J-51)
Added:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/javadoc/
james/mime4j/trunk/s
Author: bago
Date: Thu Aug 7 02:01:31 2008
New Revision: 683563
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683563&view=rev
Log:
Make it explicit this InputStreams act as FilterInputStreams (they take another
InputStream in the constructor).
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/
Author: bago
Date: Thu Aug 7 01:23:22 2008
New Revision: 683543
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683543&view=rev
Log:
Created a message.storage package and moved 4 utility classes there (this is a
specific local package to message) (MIME4J-51).
We previously discussed about this, but I forg
Author: bago
Date: Thu Aug 7 01:11:38 2008
New Revision: 683535
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=683535&view=rev
Log:
Moved remaining *Descriptor classes from main to descriptor package (great
suggestion from Niklas) (MIME4J-51).
Added:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/jame
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 21:34, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
>> The current process is a simple nighly build [that] is good
>> for the nighlies, but I think I don't have to explain the
>> difference between a real CI environment and a nighly build script.
>
>
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 18:52, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
IMHO this one (use the new struc
29 matches
Mail list logo
