JSR250 is fine for Phoenix but I'd really like to support spring IoC
for spring. I see the mailet name not as a classname but just a name.
A mailet loader should be able to resolve as a spring bean. So to make
Sieve work in Spring I plan to take a look at creating a loader which
will allow resource
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Dec 9 14:37:20 2008
New Revision: 724920
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=724920&view=rev
Log:
Improve error reporting for spring deployment test
Modified:
james/server/trunk/build-tools/smoke.xml
james/server/trunk/phoenix-deployment/build.xml
james/se
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Dec 9 12:52:26 2008
New Revision: 724881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=724881&view=rev
Log:
Check other services are still ok when testing Sieve
Modified:
james/server/trunk/build-tools/smoke.xml
Modified: james/server/trunk/build-tools/smoke.xml
URL:
http
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> the basic design outlined below should be simple and quick to
>> implement. please feel free to jump in with questions, comments or
>> improvements.
>
> "This will end up a rather large
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> you need to set up some mailets to deliver incoming mail into IMAP
>>
>>
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> On 12/9/08, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Sorry to were not clear.. I meaned grouping jSPF and JDKIM ..
>>>
>>> But yeah grouping stuff together is a great idea.
>>
>> I
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On 12/9/08, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry to were not clear.. I meaned grouping jSPF and JDKIM ..
>>
>> But yeah grouping stuff together is a great idea.
>
> I like the idea of multiple classifications. For example jDKIM might
> be classified
On 12/9/08, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to were not clear.. I meaned grouping jSPF and JDKIM ..
>
> But yeah grouping stuff together is a great idea.
I like the idea of multiple classifications. For example jDKIM might
be classified under crypto, antispam and mailet. Pages wou
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 12/8/08, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 12/5/08, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrot
Sorry to were not clear.. I meaned grouping jSPF and JDKIM ..
But yeah grouping stuff together is a great idea.
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/9 Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would list jDKIM under jSP
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would list jDKIM under jSPF.. And when jDKIM is complete we just
> need to find some time to extract the bayesian stuff to provide a
> complete set of antispam libs ;-)
antispam sounds like a better title that jSP
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On 12/8/08, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 12/5/08, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert Burrell Donkin wr
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 12/8/08, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 12/5/08, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Megha Agarval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am running the spri
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
