Eric MacAdie wrote:
> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I
> am running James on a VPS host with about 256 MB of memory, and right
> now James uses about 50 MB or so. I noticed from
> http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/bin/ that the Spring
> version is t
Hi Eric,
I don't expect the pure-spring deployment to take more memory then the
phoenix deployment do when its complete. So stay tuned...
Bye,
Norman
2009/12/26 Eric MacAdie :
> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I am
> running James on a VPS host with about 25
Yup should be OK.
Yes let us use annotations to save too much of xml.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok perfect.. I think the first step I will perform is to let all
> classes which needs to handle configurations inplement
> org.apache.james.lifecycle.Configurable interf
Ok perfect.. I think the first step I will perform is to let all
classes which needs to handle configurations inplement
org.apache.james.lifecycle.Configurable interface. Then use a
BeanPostProcessor to inject it. The same is true for logging. Let all
classes implement org.apache.james.lifecylce.Lo
Just downloading this. Will try to help in this sandbox as far as possible
with my Spring skills.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 8:47 PM, wrote:
> Author: norman
> Date: Sat Dec 26 15:17:23 2009
> New Revision: 893986
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893986&view=rev
> Log:
> add sandbox for pu
Nice point Eric.
I will try to carry out a test and let you know.
Till that time you continue with the older stable version.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
> I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I am
> running James on a VPS host with about 2
I do not mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I do have one concern. I
am running James on a VPS host with about 256 MB of memory, and right
now James uses about 50 MB or so. I noticed from
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/bin/ that the Spring
version is twice as big as the Phoenix
Author: norman
Date: Sat Dec 26 15:17:23 2009
New Revision: 893986
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893986&view=rev
Log:
add sandbox for pure spring deployment work
Added:
james/server/sandbox/active/pure_spring_deployment/ (props changed)
- copied from r893985, james/server/trun
Good point.. Anyway I think I will start to work on this these days
(in a sandbox) just because I will have some time ;) If others think
it was a bad idea at the end I will be happy to just > /dev/null it
and threat it as an funny experiment ;)
Thx for the input.
Bye,
Norman
2009/12/26 Bernd Fon
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as you all prolly know I tried to decouple james in the last couple of
> weeks from phoenix / avalon as much as possible. This task is now
> complete and James should "just work" within every container /
> framework which understand howto handle jsr250 injections
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok because I didn't hear anything against this route I will go ahead
> and try to get this stuff done.
Mmmh. I think you should give this another week or so to sink in. For
example, I am only now checking my email since days. Other might also
want to join in after the holida
No I just poped out the idea since we were considering putting James in OSGi
Anyways if there is not enough time we can for this time stick to just
spring
I am very keen to contribute into this code into Spring. Let me know how I
can be of some use.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Norman Maurer
To Be honest, I never used spring-dm but used Spring alot. What is the
benifit of using spring-dm ? Is it just OSGI?
Thx
Norman
2009/12/26, Dhrubo :
> Hi,
> Since you are trying Spring ... why not with Spring DM just a thought?
> Thanks ...dhrubo
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Norman Mau
Hi,
Since you are trying Spring ... why not with Spring DM just a thought?
Thanks ...dhrubo
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok because I didn't hear anything against this route I will go ahead
> and try to get this stuff done.
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
> 2009/12/22 Dhrubo :
Ok because I didn't hear anything against this route I will go ahead
and try to get this stuff done.
Bye,
Norman
2009/12/22 Dhrubo :
> Friends,
> Move towards pure Spring away from dead frameworks is highly
> appreciated. I think the move to a OSGi container may come in next release?
>
Author: manolo
Date: Sat Dec 26 09:59:31 2009
New Revision: 893954
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893954&view=rev
Log:
removed an unnecessary import which makes build fail
Modified:
james/hupa/trunk/client/src/main/java/org/apache/hupa/client/widgets/ConfirmDialogBox.java
Modified:
Author: manolo
Date: Sat Dec 26 09:48:40 2009
New Revision: 893953
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893953&view=rev
Log:
Fixed a bug escaping html tags in text/plain messages.
Fixed an issue when new folders are created in gmail imap servers.
Styling of Hupa dialog box.
Added:
james/hup
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
