Re: [Discussion] Road to 4.0

2020-08-26 Thread David Leangen
Hi Rene, Thanks for your reply. Sorry I just sent out my last email without having seen yours. My comments inline. >> To continue with the documentation (at least on the path I have taken so >> far) I need to better understand the vision. That will allow me to resolve >> and clarify the topi

Re: [Discussion] Road to 4.0

2020-08-26 Thread David Leangen
Hi Benoit, > I think I did answer in that thread already. Yes, you did. And thank you. >> To continue with the documentation (at least on the path I have taken so >> far) I need to better understand the vision. That will allow me to resolve >> and clarify the topics previously raised regardi

Re: [Discussion] Road to 4.0

2020-08-26 Thread Rene Cordier
Hello David, On 26/08/2020 18:10, David Leangen wrote: Hello, I am still trying to get a sense of the community’s vision, and it’s thoughts relating to how to treat users. Unfortunately I have not heard too many comments so far on this topic. Trying to read between the lines, I could think o

[jira] [Created] (JAMES-3365) JMAP RFC-8621 : Back-reference resolution

2020-08-26 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
Benoit Tellier created JAMES-3365: - Summary: JMAP RFC-8621 : Back-reference resolution Key: JAMES-3365 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3365 Project: James Server Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3357) Mailbox/set creation: simple implementation

2020-08-26 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17185560#comment-17185560 ] Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3357: --- https://github.com/linagora/james-project/

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3095) Port to jmap mailboxes/get

2020-08-26 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17185558#comment-17185558 ] Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3095: --- All subscritptions were fetched for each m

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3359) Mailbox/set update: name implementation

2020-08-26 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17185556#comment-17185556 ] Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3359: --- https://github.com/linagora/james-project/

Re: [Discussion] Road to 4.0

2020-08-26 Thread Tellier Benoit
Hello David, I did actually came back from vacation. I think I did answer in that thread already. I would love to have other people feedback as well on the opportunity to market our current "community roadmap" (documentation, product re-branding, CI) into a major release. Le 26/08/2020 à 18:

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3187) Update James Documentation

2020-08-26 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17185110#comment-17185110 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JAMES-3187: --- dleangen commented on pull request #243: U

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3187) Update James Documentation

2020-08-26 Thread David Leangen (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17185106#comment-17185106 ] David Leangen commented on JAMES-3187: -- {quote}[https://github.com/apache/james-proj

Re: [Discussion] Road to 4.0

2020-08-26 Thread David Leangen
Hello, I am still trying to get a sense of the community’s vision, and it’s thoughts relating to how to treat users. Unfortunately I have not heard too many comments so far on this topic. Trying to read between the lines, I could think of 4 potential conclusions: 1. People are still on summer