On Wednesday 08 October 2003 03:57, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Should we wait for Merlin 3.1 featuring JMX & extended logging?
> > (BTW I could help Steve on this task to boost the release cycle)
>
> Is your code unable to run with Phoenix? As Stephen is wont to say, we
> should try to be containe
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 19:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Steve,
>
> > Merlin doesn't have support for JMX and one of the goals on the
> > James roadmap is to improve monitoring / management via JMX.
>
> Quite correct. However, today James does use better logging than Merlin
> supports, and does
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 11:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Alexis Agahi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Oct 7, 7:58 AM
>
> > Currently OpenIM is providing a service to allow simple
> > notificiation for any apps, so providing
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 07:43, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Where are you lost, and which code are you looking at, since we don't
> public CVS snapshots?
Sorry for the confusion, I was talking about cvs checkout
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/james-server/
> It seems to me that your Jabber s
Folks,
I've been busy setting a stable OpenIM (http://open-im.net) release those
time, but as I'm getting close to have something really clean.
Now, I really would like to work with you, to see how we could having
OpenIM/James synergy.
To be honnest, I'm completly *lost* when reading the last C
On Monday 01 September 2003 21:58, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > What is the future of James of Phoenix developers are
> > in the new loom project?
>
> That remains to be seen. There is also the next generation container from
> the Avalon project. Personally, I would like to see some assurance that
On Sunday 31 August 2003 20:46, Manuel Soto wrote:
> What is the future of James of Phoenix developers are in the new loom
> project?
Avalon Merlin can be the great successor.
Personnaly I just ended the conversion of OpenIM from Phoenix to Merlin, and I
have to admit that Merlin is a really cl
