Re: Testing with new derby release

2006-08-11 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Noel J. Bergman wrote: >>For a) I assume there are functional tests for James, but from looking >>at the wiki I couldn't see any instructions. > > > We have unit tests. You can find them in the source code, and you can see > the results in the nightly build report. Perhaps we need more unit t

Testing with new derby release

2006-08-09 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Over in Derby land we are gearing up for a new feature release, I thought that running James with the new release would a good test. The goals would be to: a) see if James (as a database application) works with derby 10.2 with no changes, as desired b) see how the performance is with 10.2 compar

Re: Status, Release Candidates and Derby

2005-12-19 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Danny Angus wrote: >>A better datatype would be CLOB, then you could have up to 2Gb character > > limit. > >>I don't believe this would require any application changes (moving to a > > CLOB). > > >>We've seen some odd behavior dealing with CLOBs with some drivers, hence > > the > >>useBlob v

Re: Status, Release Candidates and Derby

2005-12-16 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I have spent much of ApacheCon working on testing JAMES. Ran into some > little bits, but generally OK. Ran with Derby for about 48 hours stably, I'm looking at how James uses Derby and I see for the message repository the create table statement is: CREATE TA

Re: Problems using Derby for stores

2005-11-18 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Danny Angus wrote: > >>Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >> >>>Thanks for all the info. At ApacheCon Europe I discussed with Noel (in >>>his presentation) some of the possiblilities of integrating Derby and >>>James, the first

Re: Problems using Derby for stores

2005-11-17 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Danny Angus wrote: > Dan Debrunner wrote: > > >>... bug fixes include much better performance on streaming >>BLOB/CLOB data into Derby, and reduced memory usage during those > > operations. > > Have a Cigar :-) > > It might be worth you guys knowing what our requirements are, although I > thin

Re: Problems using Derby for stores

2005-11-15 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > jta wrote: > > >>1) What version of derby is being used? Posting the output >>from this command would be the most helpful: >>java org.apache.derby.tools.sysinfo > > - Derby Information > JRE - JDBC: J2SE 1.4.2 - JDBC 3.0 > [/home/noel/ASF/james/s

Re: Problems using Derby for stores

2005-11-09 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Bernd Fondermann wrote: > I set up a local test environment and eventually saw > (a) OutOfMemorys (but only after a longer period of time, with -Xmx64M) It may be that the Derby page cache is too big for this memory size. By default the page cache is 1000 pages, and the default page size is 4k. H