Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Norman Maurer ha scritto: > Hi all, > > the 3 days are passed since I started the VOTE so here are the results: > > +1 x 3 - Stefano, Robert, Norman ( all binding ) > +0 x 0 > -0 x 1 - Bernd ( binding ) > -1 x 0 > > So we are ready for the official release. I hope I will be able to make > it

[RESULT] [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Hi all, the 3 days are passed since I started the VOTE so here are the results: +1 x 3 - Stefano, Robert, Norman ( all binding ) +0 x 0 -0 x 1 - Bernd ( binding ) -1 x 0 So we are ready for the official release. I hope I will be able to make it official tomorrow. Bye Norman PS: Stefano m

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > If I understand correctly, if we'd have released james-project already > separately, the build would have succeeded? Yes, but you will have to not use "-Plocal" in this case. > But not if I am offline, of course, which leads me to the general note > that I am very m

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

If I understand correctly, if we'd have released james-project already separately, the build would have succeeded? But not if I am offline, of course, which leads me to the general note that I am very much in favor of self-contained releases. Right? My personal opinion is that a release which st

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > Downloaded apache-jspf-0.9.5-src.tar.gz from the staging directory, > unpacked it and ran > mvn -P local package > like suggested in BUILDING.txt. But it gives me an error: > > > [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. > > GroupId: org.apache.james > ArtifactId: ja

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Downloaded apache-jspf-0.9.5-src.tar.gz from the staging directory, unpacked it and ran mvn -P local package like suggested in BUILDING.txt. But it gives me an error: [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. GroupId: org.apache.james ArtifactId: james-project Version: 1.2 Reason: Unable to do

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Norman Maurer ha scritto: > So please review and VOTE ;-) We will be the first and only asynchron / > RFC conform SPF-Java-implementation out there , if we pass the VOTE. > So VOTE :-P . > [...] [X] +1 Yes plz make this release official! If not I will get nuts :-P Stefano

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

On 9/21/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > VOTE: > [X] +1 Yes plz make this release official! > [ ] +0 Cool to see the release > [ ] -0 Why a new release. Anyway I don't care to much.. Do what you want > [ ] -1 No.. I don't want a new release for some reason! -

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

On 9/23/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > is > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/jspf/trunk/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/rfc4408-tests.yml > > mentioned in the NOTICE or LICENSE documents? > > Yes, pyspf-tests.yml and rfc4408-

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > is > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/jspf/trunk/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/rfc4408-tests.yml > mentioned in the NOTICE or LICENSE documents? Yes, pyspf-tests.yml and rfc4408-tests.yml are the files "implicitly" referred by this text in the

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

On 9/22/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > >> http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/james-project/1.2/james-project-1.2-site.xml > >> is missing it's apache header > > > > Thank you for

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/james-project/1.2/james-project-1.2-site.xml >> is missing it's apache header > > Thank you for pointing this out. > Does this needs a "repackaging"/"retagging" a

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On 9/21/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> james-project: >> http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/james-project/1.2/ > > http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/james-project/1.2/

Re: [VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

On 9/21/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > james-project: > http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/james-project/1.2/ http://people.apache.org/~norman/staging-repository/org/apache/james/james-project/1.2/james-project-1.2-site.xml is missing it's apach

[VOTE] jSPF-0.9.5 and james-project-1.2

Hi dev's , Stefano and me finally found the time to prepare for next jSPF release... We did a james-project release preparation too because of some dependencies problems we had in the past ( did some failure by mistake). So please review and VOTE ;-) We will be the first and only asynchron / RF