On 8/24/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
You say New approach to spooling. How does the proposal affect
spooling 'in general'?
How is this related to past propositions (IIRC) to evolve RD from a
mailet to something better, e.g. an own processor?
Maybe
On 8/25/06, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I also have a lot of things in my todo list, so I at least try to review
the proposal and try to understand where it is better or worst of what I
already use.
well, I think we should eventually merge (the best of)
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This is an approach to implement the scheduling aspect of my New Approach
to Spooling proposla. It is intentionally compatible with the existing
Mailet API.
As a reminder, I already made comments to the New Approach to Spooling
and I have a (stalled, maybe working)
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
You say New approach to spooling. How does the proposal affect
spooling 'in general'?
How is this related to past propositions (IIRC) to evolve RD from a
mailet to something better, e.g. an own processor?
Maybe you're referring to my proposal to create a
Hi Noel,
Nice proposal. I have questions about the 'big picture':
Although I understand that you say the Scheduler is working with the
RemoteDelivery, is this a proposal to either
o replace RemoteDelivery or greater parts from it in short term
o take one aspect of RD and make it available in
