One of the things I'd like for us to do is change the SMTP handler to allow
specifying the entry point for injecting messages into the pipeline, rather
than the hardcoded "root", and likewise for FetchMail. So messages coming
from FetchMail might enter the pipeline in a different processor, and go
Using the fastfail MessageHandler filter it should be possible to call
the setState for the message being received and the message would be
posted to that repository: wouldn't this be enough?
Stefano
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
One of the things I'd like for us to do is change the SMTP handler to
Yes this should work.. Good idea..
bye
Norman
Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
Using the fastfail MessageHandler filter it should be possible to call
the setState for the message being received and the message would be
posted to that repository: wouldn't this be enough?
Stefano
Noel J. Bergman wrot
+1
(will there be unit tests?)
On 8/28/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the things I'd like for us to do is change the SMTP handler to allow
specifying the entry point for injecting messages into the pipeline, rather
than the hardcoded "root", and likewise for FetchMail. S
Maybe you should look at Stefanos idea how we can do this. It sounds
easier and cleaner for me...
And yes you are right we need mre junit tests.
bye
Norman
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
+1
(will there be unit tests?)
On 8/28/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the things I'd li
