In that case definitely use the IMAP2 proposal as it has a set of JUnit
tests to test the protocol.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 April 2005 16:53
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: RE: Mina SMTP implementation updates
&g
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 09:42 +0100, Jason Webb wrote:
> IMHO I'd leave IMAP alone unless you really, really want IMAP.
> NNTP might be a better option as the IMAP code does not persist anything to
> a permanent store so it's useless for most people at the moment.
> However if you just want the proto
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Heath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 April 2005 07:55
> To: server-dev@james.apache.org
> Subject: Mina SMTP implementation updates
>
> For those that are interested, I've updated my Mina based SMTP
> implementation. I've added most of the suggest
