Hi Garry,
On 07/09/2021 20:29, Jean Helou wrote:
> Hi garry,
>
> I think this concern is more valid for the retirement of the maildir[1]
> implementation (mailbox) than for the mailqueue.
> I don't think messages are expected to remain in the mailqueue for a very
> long time, which is why the
Hi garry,
I think this concern is more valid for the retirement of the maildir[1]
implementation (mailbox) than for the mailqueue.
I don't think messages are expected to remain in the mailqueue for a very
long time, which is why the advocated migration path includes downtime :
- stop accepting
My only concern would be those people who are still, for some reason, not
yet ready to move to James 3.x - yes, there are still some out there. They
are more likely to be using the file repo than 3.x users. If they are
using a file repo, we might want to keep a migration tool around to migrate
+1
Le 06/09/2021 à 14:54, Jean Helou a écrit :
awesome :)
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:52 PM btell...@apache.org
wrote:
Hello Jean,
On 06/09/2021 18:42, Jean Helou wrote:
Hello benoit,
There are some alternatives: embedded activeMQ has zero dependencies.
Furthermore migrating is easy: just
awesome :)
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:52 PM btell...@apache.org
wrote:
> Hello Jean,
>
> On 06/09/2021 18:42, Jean Helou wrote:
> > Hello benoit,
> >
> >
> >> There are some alternatives: embedded activeMQ has zero dependencies.
> >> Furthermore migrating is easy: just migrate with an empty queue
Hello Jean,
On 06/09/2021 18:42, Jean Helou wrote:
> Hello benoit,
>
>
>> There are some alternatives: embedded activeMQ has zero dependencies.
>> Furthermore migrating is easy: just migrate with an empty queue - which
>> can be done easily with a SMTP downtime.
>>
>> Also the component is
Hello benoit,
> There are some alternatives: embedded activeMQ has zero dependencies.
> Furthermore migrating is easy: just migrate with an empty queue - which
> can be done easily with a SMTP downtime.
>
> Also the component is deprecated for 1.5 years, given the many flows it
> have, given
Hello,
Sounds legit to me, +1!
Thanks for looking into that deeply.
Rene.
On 05/09/2021 20:03, btell...@apache.org wrote:
Hello there,
While working on JAMES-3646 incorrect file validation, I came to
discover the file mail queue incorrectly sanitizes file paths.
This is one of the many
Hello there,
While working on JAMES-3646 incorrect file validation, I came to
discover the file mail queue incorrectly sanitizes file paths.
This is one of the many flows of this component. Here are some others:
FileMailQueue is an outdated unmaintained component suffering incomplete
features