Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-09 Thread Eugen Stan
Great. And as you said, it is important that whoever can answer some questions, please find the time to do it. You are helping yourself - the community grows, James grows, we all get to benefit. La 09.07.2020 05:05, Tellier Benoit a scris: > Le 09/07/2020 à 07:42, David Leangen a écrit : >> Hi

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread Tellier Benoit
Le 09/07/2020 à 07:42, David Leangen a écrit : > Hi Eugen, > > Thanks for your support. > >> GIven the discussion around the specific topics I think we are getting >> our documentation. >> @David: If you can do just that: ask questions and compile the answers >> it would be a huge win for us. >

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread David Leangen
Hi Eugen, Thanks for your support. > GIven the discussion around the specific topics I think we are getting > our documentation. > @David: If you can do just that: ask questions and compile the answers > it would be a huge win for us. Thanks, that is indeed the intent since the beginning. The

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread Eugen Stan
Hi. I don't have something to add to this thread specifically, but I would like to point out that: GIven the discussion around the specific topics I think we are getting our documentation. All we need to do now is copy paste it, curate it and edited in asciidoc format. I'll even put in the

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread Tellier Benoit
Le 08/07/2020 à 15:33, David Leangen a écrit : > Thanks. > > I love this James adventure. It is not boring. Every time I scratch the > surface, a new concept pops out.  > > Ok, so digging in… :-) >> Also as Matthieu said, RemoteDelivery is a side effect of the current >> Processing chain. > I

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread David Leangen
Thanks. I love this James adventure. It is not boring. Every time I scratch the surface, a new concept pops out.  Ok, so digging in… > Also as Matthieu said, RemoteDelivery is a side effect of the current > Processing chain. I looked at org.apache.james.transport.mailets.RemoteDelivery,

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread Tellier Benoit
Le 08/07/2020 à 14:39, David Leangen a écrit : >> The only wrong thing about this picture is the SMTP Service before >> "Outgoing". > Ok, thank you Matthieu. > >> As weird as it is, the delivery of messages to a remote server is done by a >> Mailet called RemoteDelivery and it's not handled by

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread Tellier Benoit
Nice image!  - there is a queue before SMTP outgoing service (as you don't want to handle SMTP synchronously anyway) client -> SMTP (in, as a server) -> queue (spool) -> Processing chain -> Queue (outgoing) -> RemoteDelivery runnable Also as Matthieu said, RemoteDelivery is a side effect of the

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread David Leangen
> The only wrong thing about this picture is the SMTP Service before "Outgoing". Ok, thank you Matthieu. > As weird as it is, the delivery of messages to a remote server is done by a > Mailet called RemoteDelivery and it's not handled by the SMTP Service. > As far as I know, a lot of people

Re: SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread Matthieu Baechler
On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 16:21 +0900, David Leangen wrote: > Still on the topic of SMTP relay and the original image I posted at > the beginning of this thread: > —> https://james.apache.org/images/james-smtp-relay.png > > > Would the attached (lousy) image be a reasonable representation of > the

SMTP Relay (Was: Queuing vs. spooling)

2020-07-08 Thread David Leangen
Still on the topic of SMTP relay and the original image I posted at the beginning of this thread: —> https://james.apache.org/images/james-smtp-relay.png Would the attached (lousy) image be a reasonable representation of the general concept of an SMTP Relay? signature.asc Description: