Serge,
What did you have in mind when implementing forward and alias as part of the
user repository record? Just the "obvious"? And why both? I'd like some
concept of what you had in mind.
I am asking because when we revise user repositories, I am wondering if we
should discard those in favor
On 5/25/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Serge,
What did you have in mind when implementing forward and alias as part of the
user repository record? Just the "obvious"? And why both? I'd like some
concept of what you had in mind.
I am asking because when we revise user reposito
Am Donnerstag, den 25.05.2006, 23:17 -0400 schrieb Serge Knystautas:
> On 5/25/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Serge,
> >
> > What did you have in mind when implementing forward and alias as part of the
> > user repository record? Just the "obvious"? And why both? I'd like som
Serge Knystautas wrote:
I didn't have anything to do with the user repositories. :) I think
James is lacking on a lot of what I consider basic mailbox features...
Can you name a few features you miss? (I just want to be sure I
understood the right features)
Stefano
---
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Serge,
What did you have in mind when implementing forward and alias as part of the
user repository record? Just the "obvious"? And why both? I'd like some
concept of what you had in mind.
I am asking because when we revise user repositories, I am wondering if we
shoul
On 5/26/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Serge Knystautas wrote:
> I didn't have anything to do with the user repositories. :) I think
> James is lacking on a lot of what I consider basic mailbox features...
Can you name a few features you miss? (I just want to be sure I
understoo
