Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
the question is how much toolkit is worthwhile moving in as well. it
would be better if standard mailets were just a runtime dependency.
this woul
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > the question is how much toolkit is worthwhile moving in as well. it
> > would be better if standard mailets were just a runtime dependency.
> > this would mean moving some abstra
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would have preferred to vote on the actual classes to be moved there,
> because I agree that
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I would have preferred to vote on the actual classes to be moved there,
> > because I agree that mailet-base is needed, but
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would have preferred to vote on the actual classes to be moved there,
> because I agree that mailet-base is needed, but I don't know if we agree on
> what to move there ;-)
i don't see the point arguing about detai
