On 8 February 2012 11:58, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Moodle - seemed to fail on first boot, worked on second. Using
> moodle-xs-1.9.5.xs2-1.xs11.noarch. Need to dig further.
>
> Which moodle branch should I be working with?
>
> Hi Martin
I have likely missed some previous discussions, but are we mov
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Ready for the next round of reviews for the XS work. I've now
> performed basic testing of all aspects of the system, so I feel this
> is ready for merging and wider testing.
Thanks!
> xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yesterday:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:23 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote:
> Which releases of erlang and ejabbered are you using?
I unfortunately don't have the version number handy, but this should
help: this coming XS release only ships a configuration and init
scripts for ejabberd -- it's based on RHEL6.2/Ce
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Tabitha Roder wrote:
> I have likely missed some previous discussions, but are we moving to Moodle
> 2.x or staying with Moodle 1.9.x on XS?
Daniel is doing a very focused update of the XS, to run on a more
current Linux base (CentOS6.x/RHEL6.x). So no major compon
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yesterday:
>
> I think that the new pu branch you pushed out is incomplete. It has a
> very short run of patches, a massive diff from the pu I reviewed, and
> it ends at
>
> 11bdbdb Add setup.d
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> How will this play with XS on ARM?
>
> It won't at all, yet.
>
> However, the liberation of the packages from the base install is the
> first step in this direction.
Yep - we plan to cont
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> As agreed and directed by Martin this will become the next OLPC XS release.
And you can't imagine how pleased I am with this!
> Here in Nicaragua, the Zamora Teran Foundation has the task *this
> month* of deploying One Laptop per Child to e
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Pushed an old branch - please look again now.
Looks great.
The only problem is the name - rename pu to master.
>>> ds-backup: pu branch ready for review
>>
>> Looks good. We'll make a server & client release together. I have a
>> buglet to
On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:23 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Which releases of erlang and ejabbered are you using?
>
> I unfortunately don't have the version number handy, but this should
> help: this coming XS release only ships a confi
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:27 PM, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:23 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> Which releases of erlang and ejabbered are you using?
>>
>> I unfortunately don't have the version number han
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To avoid leaving the other threads dangling:
>
> I have been working on a new XS release in collaboration with the
> Zamora Teran Foundation (http://www.fundacionzt.org/). The underlying
> goal here is to move the XS to a new OS base, w
Hi Daniel, et al,
Perhaps, after the push is over, I'd like to see posted in some public
place, a script to fetch all of the sources for the RPM's that make up the
new XS.
I say this because as I was trying to recreate XS-0.6, i became confused
whether sources were at git/ssh:git/ssh://dev.laptop
Hi,
With the XS rebase to CentOS6.2, EPEL-6 brought us ejabberd-2.1.8.
We found an issue that the Online group cannot be marked as @online@
correctly. Upgrading to ejabberd-2.1.10 (from EPEL6-testing) fixes
this.
However, there is a regression with collaboration: presence doesn't work right.
I t
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> With the XS rebase to CentOS6.2, EPEL-6 brought us ejabberd-2.1.8.
> We found an issue that the Online group cannot be marked as @online@
> correctly. Upgrading to ejabberd-2.1.10 (from EPEL6-testing) fixes
> this.
That's good news. As I menti
On Feb 8, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the XS rebase to CentOS6.2, EPEL-6 brought us ejabberd-2.1.8.
> We found an issue that the Online group cannot be marked as @online@
> correctly. Upgrading to ejabberd-2.1.10 (from EPEL6-testing) fixes
> this.
>
> However, there is
15 matches
Mail list logo
