>> We need to report this to the Raspberry Pi Foundation to see if they can
>> fix it -- WiFi connections are repeatedly failing, sometimes even very soon
>> after booting, profoundly affecting Internet-in-a-Box 6.5 !
>>
>> But first a big Thanks In Advance to all who can reproduce this & offer
>>
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:37 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
> Just FYI...
>
> Apache 2.4.6 was released July ~19, 2013 (used by IIAB/XSCE 6.2 on CentOS).
>
> Apache 2.4.10 was released Jule ~19, 2014 (used by IIAB/XSCE 6.2 on
> Debian/Raspbian).
>
> Apache 2.4.25 was release Dec ~19, 2016...if anybody knows
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> IIAB/XSCE 6.2 is installed on CentOS 7.3 on a NUC, and this error message
> appears whenever I open a Terminal:
>
>Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status ssh.service
>Unit ssh.service could not be found.
>
> Does anyone know if/where I can
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
>> > Congrats to the F24 Team:
>> >
>> > The strategic question from a broad deploym
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Tim Moody wrote:
> For those who wish to experiment I have added several rpi3 images to
> http://xsce.org/downloads/xsce-release-6.0/rpi-images/
Fedora 25 will have Raspberry Pi support for both the RPi2 and RPi3 as
part of Beta due in a couple of weeks.
> These a
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
>> > Congrats to the F24 Team:
>> >
>> > The strategic question from a broad deployment perspective across the
>> > world's lower-middle class is increasingly Raspberry Pi support,
>> > according
>> > to so many grassroots/field groups I'm spea
ial release won't have OOTB support
for either (firmware or otherwise).
> By necessity, I've been playing with raspian, because there's been a lot of
> hype/hope for opportunistic device to device file sharing with rpi3.
Meh, it's never really taken off anywhere else
&
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Adam Holt wrote:
> Congrats to the F24 Team:
>
> The strategic question from a broad deployment perspective across the
> world's lower-middle class is increasingly Raspberry Pi support, according
> to so many grassroots/field groups I'm speaking with in 2016, very
F-24, I've got most of the bits in
place, just need the time to finish it off. We'll be supporting it
like the Pi foundation as a ARMv7 device. Single images for both
device (less confusion) and as it's only got 1Gb of RAM you don't get
any real advantage to 64 bit support and
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On May 10, 2016 3:21 PM, "Peter Robinson" wrote:
>>
>> We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA and
>> have a disk image for use.
>
> Great News!
>
> Tangentially:
We do have initial pine64 support, I plan to improve it more for GA and
have a disk image for use.
Peter
On 10 May 2016 18:44, "Adam Holt" wrote:
> Not sure the 64-bit implications of this for RPi3 and Pine64, but FYI.
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "
>> Yesterday, an interesting issue happened. On an older XSCE install, the
>> squid cache bloated over time to create a 300GB swap file and made the
>> server unusable. I was wondering if anyone else may have come across this
>> before?
>
>
> Yes, much the same occurred on an XSCE 5.1+ in Rwanda ea
to F24. I agree that we want to get there.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 6:42 AM
>> To: Tim Moody
>> Cc: xsce-de...@googlegroups.com; Adam Holt ; server-
>> devel
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Tim Moody wrote:
> For xsce I'd start with f22. You can look at the rpi images on
> xsce.org/downloads
They're 32 bit ARMv7 are they not? Personally I'd be starting with
Fedora 24 as you'll have support until July 2017, instead of the 3 or
so months left for for F
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> Awesome we can start banging on this long-awaited HW!.
>
> Who can recommend the best/emerging/viable Fedora 22 vs. 23 vs. 24 options
> to Alex?
Fedora 24 definitely here, I'll actually be producing aarch64 images
shortly for this which will incl
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2016 3:22 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote:
>> things like
>> the PINE64 above it has a SoC attached network but not storage.
>
> Both SATA (real TB+ disks) and Ethernet (external Wi-Fi AP antennae) are
&
> You are the expert here (on the low end especially, with $5 Raspberri Pi
> Zeros!) leading OLE refugee camp deployments across many countries. Whereas
> most OLPC-like schools I talk to want to spend $100 (or more) for a
> mini-server that's truly resilient for years in tropical environments,
>
>> > Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder
>> > tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose.
>>
>> Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5!
>>
>> > There were a few more minor issues found with the build process. But I
>> >
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:05 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> The v4.1-rc5 kernel boots fine on XO-1.5, though there are a few
> things to be fixed; screen blanks on boot, camera LED stays on and
> camera doesn't work, temperature of CPU is not accessible, and suspend
> fails to complete. Some of these
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> Given I looked into this before with F22 Beta(*), I ran OLPC OS Builder
> tonight, excluding nothing from all repositories, and let it loose.
Funny! I was doing exactly the same yesterday for the 1.5!
> There were a few more minor issues
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:31 PM, George Hunt wrote:
> If I set just the goals of getting keyboard input, and display output, what
> problems will I face trying to use defconfig_xo1.5 from dev.laptop.org
> (x86-3.3 branch)?
>
> Does anyone have a config file that works on the XO1.5 on a Fedora rele
>> Are we planning to do anything with Sugar at the Fedora Flock Conference
>> (August 12-15, Rochester NY - www.flocktofedora.org) this year?
>>
>> The call for talks just ended although it might be possible to sneak one
>> in.
>
>
> The call for papers is open until May 2, 2015:
> http://fedorama
So to confirm there is no support for Secure Boot in RHEL-6 and hence
CentOS-6. For this to work you'll definitely need CentOS7.
If the NUC devices are baytrail the issue might not actually be
SecureBoot at all but rather that they have a 32 bit uEFI
implementation and that's not currently support
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Adam Holt wrote:
> Tony Anderson’s is leaving to Africa in 6 days, assisting many different
> school server deployments, and needs help getting around "secure"
> BIOS/firmware UEFI on the following platforms:
>
>
> - NUC 34010 - BIOS upgrade solves this, by moving
any mechanical testing/specs — I guess nobody
> will ever drop it…
And kids aren't rough wit things at all... ever ;-)
> On Oct 16, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tim Moody wrote:
>>> I personally have not had
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Tim Moody wrote:
> I personally have not had much luck with Indiegogo as far as actually
> getting stuff is concerned, but an interesting project if rather expensive.
>
> https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/pi-top-a-raspberry-pi-laptop-you-build-yourself
It would b
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Tony Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was discussion of this at the SF sprint.
>
> As I understand it, openWRT (from the Shuttleworth project) can be installed
> on
> a TP-Link router. It can be configured to serve connected XOs (such as in a
> classroom)
> on a mes
On 23 Apr 2013 01:21, "Sameer Verma" wrote:
>
> Beagleboard Black at $45
>
>
http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2013/04/22/death-to-raspberrypi-beaglebone-black-is-on-a-market/
Why is it another server board? Just dumping links without an explanation
isn't very helpful. Its not really suitable as a
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> Another ARM board, courtesy of Robert Howard.
>
> http://linux-sunxi.org/Cubieboard
There's a Fedora 18 remix image that will work with this device available.
Peter
___
Server-devel mailing list
S
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:46 PM, German Ruiz wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> Sorry, last message was sent without finish.
>
> Just asking if anyone here knows about fanless server in the field, in any
> country, i was looking at the wiki[1], and the only information about
> hardware from this vendors
Can you provide more details?
Peter
> Reinstalling with 0.6, the networking works fine
>
> David
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Robinson [mailto:pbrobin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2012 7:28 p.m.
> To: Jerry Vonau
> Cc: David Leeming; XS Devel
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:57 +1000, David Leeming wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am training some teachers in PNG to set up school servers. We are
>> using the EPC-AT270 (brochure attached, specs on page 7) and
>> previously have installed X_-v0.
erride the default arch, so that yum will do what I want
> it to do. But I have google for that!
Why do you need to override the arch? What exactly are you trying to do?
> Thanks for your help,
>
> George
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:42 AM, George Hunt wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> You probably know the answer to this question off the top of your head.
>
> I've played with fedora's Trimslice armv7hl, using it to recompile XS rpms.
> Now in conversation with OLPC-Australia, I've agreed to try to apply my
> st
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:11 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:14 AM, George Hunt wrote:
>>> I'm not done yet, but I've been making progress on porting XS code to ARM by
>>> making modifications to DSD's XS-0.7.
On May 19, 2012 8:22 PM, "George Hunt" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There are no entries in /var/log/messages or dmesg relating to my test
USB stick at /dev/sdb1, even though during the boot process, dracut sees an
8 GB sdb as well as the 132GB hard disk on sda that is the rootfs (so I
think the proper
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:58 PM, rihowa...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 10, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:03 AM, George Hunt wrote:
>>> I left my fitpc2 and msi servers in the Philippines, hoping they would be
>>> pressed into service in a classroom situa
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> Note that currently Puppet relies on some hard coded intel specific code.
>>
>> Oh really? I'm assuming it'd be in the "facter" code, using lspci and
>> dmidecode to get the "facts" about hardware
>
> I just checked ARM Koji an
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:55 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>> Why not an XO-1.75 ?
>
> Good point. And XO + AP + HDD would work fantastic.
>
> George, how many users per server? If <100, an XO-1.75 will do ok.
> Want to sign up for the Contr
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> I'd recommend, on XO-1.5
>>
>> - take a 11.x.y buid
>> - use the yum repos dsd prepared for XS, groupinstall the right group ("OLPC
>> School Server"?)
>> - disable the prefdm servi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>>> We managed to install XS 0.7 using the CentOS 6.2(minimal) + EPEL +
>>> OLPC XS approach. The machine is SolidLogic box (same
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I now have an XS fully up and running and passing all my basic tests.
> Here are the remaining items that need addressing before we have a
> test release:
>
> ejabberd - see the other thread. Need to decide on forking the package
> as
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:27 PM, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:23 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> Which releases of erlang and ejabbered are you using?
>>
>> I unfortunately don't have the version number han
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>>
>> I've now seen 3 failure cases - the AR8152 mentioned above, and
>> another case which I only had time to do a quick boot check of
>> F9/C6/F16 (F16 was the only one that recognise
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> I assume here that CentOS is reasonably in sync with RHEL. Does
>> http://elrepo.org/bugs/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=126 help? More
>> generally, does any of the external repos have a
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:40 AM, George Hunt wrote:
>> I met Tony Anderson in Haiti, and again at the San Francisco OLPC Summit in
>> late 2011. He prevailed upon me to spend some time trying to figure out how
>> to rebase XS on a more recen
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> I have a XS setup at a remote location in India, where the XS has a
> Ethernet port set up as WAN, and a Mesh antenna (USB) set up as the
> LAN interface. We've used the Ethernet WAN port via a crossover cable
> via Internet-connection-sharing
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> I was thinking (once again) about the possibility of running XS on a
> XO 1.5. On the XO-1 the built-in radio runs in the 802.11s mesh mode
> and serves out IPs via DHCP. Given that the 1.5 does not do 802.11s
> mesh, can't the radio instead s
On 2 Jul 2011 18:57, "Sameer Verma" wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any experience with a USB-stick based 3g unit made by
> MicroMax. micromax mmx352g We are looking to use this in India, either
> directly on an XO or on the XS. Wanted to ping the lists before I go
> digging. It hasn't been plug-and-p
Again, I like where this discussion is going, so it may be worthwhile
> to take some of this back to the drawing board. There is the issue of:
>
> 1) distro independence
>
If you want distro independence you end up with a document of best practices
on how to install a XS/Sugar server. That's not a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> I think my biggest technical concerns in XS-land are twofold:
>
> * we need the XS to behave well on an *existing* network (i.e.
> single interface), without trying to be a gateway or duplicating core
> network services (DNS, DHCP, etc.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> There's more details about ARM on Fedora on the project page (which
>> also links to the arm mailing list etc).
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:58 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> I am back to working on getting the XS working on one of my ARM systems with
>> a more recent Fedora version.
>
> Hi Robert
>
> - that's excellent news! Ask on de...@lists.l
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/stable/olpc/xs-0.6/i386/xs-activation-0.2.39.g2277cdf-1.xs9.noarch.rpm
>
> Straightforward "rpm -ivh" of the RPM gives dependency errors. It needs:
> olpc-contents
> python = 2.5
> python-json
> usbmount
> xs-tools
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:19 AM, David Leeming
wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked before. The Mac Mini was tested by someone
> here with a watt meter and ran between 16 and 30 watts max. Very useful for
> solar powered locations.
>
>
>
> Are there any issues with installing XS on one?
>
I don't
Hi Anna,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Anna wrote:
> I know this has nothing specific to do with the XS, but maybe it'll help
> others, as I spent ages searching around for the solution. Some of us are
> reusing legacy Dells and those can be difficult to deal with in a Linux only
> environmen
> We have looked at two machines. The Fit PC and the Fit PC2. Both were for
> small deployments (<25 units).
>
> The Fit PC:
> 500MHz Geode, with 512MB RAM. Full specs at
> http://www.fit-pc.com/fit-pc1/whats-new.html
> Power consumption at the AC/DC powerbrick = 8W
> Stays warm to the touch (104 F
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Hamilton Chua wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> Happy New Year !
>
> We run our XS inside virtual machines. I have XS inside virtualbox on my
> Lenovo T61 laptop
>
> Santa Rosa Core 2 DUO 2.0 Ghz
> 4GB DDR2
> 120GB HDD
>
> while Solutiongrove runs a couple of XS installat
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> In between various complications, I have been working on getting an
> initial rebase of the XS packages and build infra to F11.
>
> After much wrangling with revisor, comps and image-creator, I have an
> initial installer iso an
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
> wrote:
>> I think I told you that at the SugarCamp in Paris
>
> You weren't the only one :-) and in general it seemed to make sense.
>
> Ah, well. We're programmers, not mindreade
Hi Martin,
0.6 looks like a great release.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> So the F-9-based XS-0.6 is closed (at long last), and the next step is
> to prep 0.7 based on F-11. Here is a rundown of the packaging /
> installer work I think needs to be done:
>
> =Rebuild pa
>> I'm afraid that's not always true. Running Debian Lenny here without
>
> Paul, Iñaki, -- you guys are right.
>
> It also means that there's no point worrying about pushing extra
> records in the DNS responses.
It won't affect the XS side of things, but from the XO client side of
things the new
Hi Jerry,
>> > I have anaconda running on the XO, installs to usbkeys/booting from are
>> > fine with F9. F11's anaconda runs straight away, but opps when installing
>> > the rpms to the MMC card.
>>
>> I think the issue your seeing with F11 should be fixed in the next
>> rawhide push (anaconda-11
> I have anaconda running on the XO, installs to usbkeys/booting from are
> fine with F9. F11's anaconda runs straight away, but opps when installing
> the rpms to the MMC card.
I think the issue your seeing with F11 should be fixed in the next
rawhide push (anaconda-11.5.0.45-1), I've been seeing
64 matches
Mail list logo
