Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:27 PM, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:23 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> Which releases of erlang and ejabbered are you using? >> >> I unfortunately don't have the version number han

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread rihowa...@gmail.com
On Feb 8, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:23 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com > wrote: >> Which releases of erlang and ejabbered are you using? > > I unfortunately don't have the version number handy, but this should > help: this coming XS release only ships a confi

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Pushed an old branch - please look again now. Looks great. The only problem is the name - rename pu to master. >>> ds-backup: pu branch ready for review >> >> Looks good.  We'll make a server & client release together. I have a >> buglet to

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread Daniel Drake
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yesterday: > > I think that the new pu branch you pushed out is incomplete. It has a > very short run of patches, a massive diff from the pu I reviewed, and > it ends at > >  11bdbdb Add setup.d

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Tabitha Roder wrote: > I have likely missed some previous discussions, but are we moving to Moodle > 2.x or staying with Moodle 1.9.x on XS? Daniel is doing a very focused update of the XS, to run on a more current Linux base (CentOS6.x/RHEL6.x). So no major compon

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:23 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com wrote: > Which releases of erlang and ejabbered are you using? I unfortunately don't have the version number handy, but this should help: this coming XS release only ships a configuration and init scripts for ejabberd -- it's based on RHEL6.2/Ce

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Ready for the next round of reviews for the XS work. I've now > performed basic testing of all aspects of the system, so I feel this > is ready for merging and wider testing. Thanks! > xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yesterday:

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-08 Thread Tabitha Roder
On 8 February 2012 11:58, Daniel Drake wrote: > Moodle - seemed to fail on first boot, worked on second. Using > moodle-xs-1.9.5.xs2-1.xs11.noarch. Need to dig further. > > Which moodle branch should I be working with? > > Hi Martin I have likely missed some previous discussions, but are we mov

Re: [Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-07 Thread rihowa...@gmail.com
On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Ready for the next round of reviews for the XS work. I've now > performed basic testing of all aspects of the system, so I feel this > is ready for merging and wider testing. > > xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yest

[Server-devel] XS rebase review

2012-02-07 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Martin, Ready for the next round of reviews for the XS work. I've now performed basic testing of all aspects of the system, so I feel this is ready for merging and wider testing. xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yesterday: - 172.18.0.1 binding readded - xs-services-check checks th