+1 from me.
The current system is fine for a simple POP server, but is broken for
anything more complex. The JavaMail option is the way forward IMHO. I
believe (Noel?) discussed this before, although I can't find the messages in
the archive.
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 October 2005 09:53
> To: 'James Users List'
> Subject: Re: IMAP status
>
> > There is a key blocking requirement that must be resolved before I can
> > proceed: The James repository must be made into a prop
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 October 2005 09:53
> To: 'James Users List'
> Subject: Re: IMAP status
>
> > There is a key blocking requirement that must be resolved before I can
> > proceed: The James repository must be made into a prop
The IMAP work is currently stalled (as people may have noticed) because I
have so little time to work on it.
There is a key blocking requirement that must be resolved before I can
proceed: The James repository must be made into a proper hierarchical store
a la ImapStore IIRC. Without this I'm a bit
The IMAP work is currently stalled (as people may have noticed) because I
have so little time to work on it.
There is a key blocking requirement that must be resolved before I can
proceed: The James repository must be made into a proper hierarchical store
a la ImapStore IIRC. Without this I'm a bit
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Goodrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 July 2005 23:30
> To: server-user@james.apache.org
> Subject: mail.getName problems
>
> I'm using java 1.4.2 and building a custom james mailet. When I try
> to compile with the Mail object function getName
0.0.0.0 is an "all networks, all ip's" identifier. This includes localhost
(127.0.0.1) and any other IP addresses your machine may be listening on. So
no, you can't connect to James on all the IP address it may be listening on.
For example (on my winxp box)
TCP0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Gulbrandsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 July 2005 19:08
> To: server-user@james.apache.org
> Subject: Custom Mailet or Repository
>
> Hi all,
>
> I want to store emails in a database. But, I want to index the inbox
> emails in a different way t
> -Original Message-
> From: Diogo Saad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 June 2005 23:35
> To: James Users List
> Subject: eml /msg file format
>
> Is there a simple way to save every files ( every message) in var/inbox
> directory in eml format??
No there isn't.
However you can use
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Gulbrandsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2005 22:35
> To: server-user@james.apache.org
> Subject: db schema question
>
> Greetings,
>
> james creates a table named 'inbox' (or whatever one configures it to
> be). This table has a composite
If you look in DefaultUser.java for the method setPassword(String newPass)
you'll find
hashedPassword = DigestUtil.digestString(newPass, algorithm);
where the algorithm is always "SHA"
So in answer to your question, use the Java SHA implementation rather than
the MySQL one. I don't know enough
If you look in DefaultUser.java for the method setPassword(String newPass)
you'll find
hashedPassword = DigestUtil.digestString(newPass, algorithm);
where the algorithm is always "SHA"
So in answer to your question, use the Java SHA implementation rather than
the MySQL one. I don't know enough
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 May 2005 16:25
> To: 'James Users List'
> Subject: Re: James configuration advice sought for bulk sending
>
> > Beware of "tar-pitting" whereby a mail server will
> > deliberat
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 May 2005 16:25
> To: 'James Users List'
> Subject: Re: James configuration advice sought for bulk sending
>
> > Beware of "tar-pitting" whereby a mail server will
> > deliberat
> -Original Message-
< snip'd>
> I also used 80 threads.
> I'm currently working on optimisations on the RemoteDelivery mailet
> (multiple mail in a single connection, error caching, and more).
Beware of "tar-pitting" whereby a mail server will deliberately slow down
data transmission i
> -Original Message-
< snip'd>
> I also used 80 threads.
> I'm currently working on optimisations on the RemoteDelivery mailet
> (multiple mail in a single connection, error caching, and more).
Beware of "tar-pitting" whereby a mail server will deliberately slow down
data transmission i
According to me:
> nslookup
set querytype=mx
Non-authoritative answer:
celebrate-austin.comMX preference = 0, mail exchanger =
mail.locallinux.com
So they have a mail server :)
telnet mail.locallinux.com 25
220 nagheenanajar.locallinux.com (no one in this country can ever say my
name right
According to me:
> nslookup
set querytype=mx
Non-authoritative answer:
celebrate-austin.comMX preference = 0, mail exchanger =
mail.locallinux.com
So they have a mail server :)
telnet mail.locallinux.com 25
220 nagheenanajar.locallinux.com (no one in this country can ever say my
name right
I think the server may have a firewall or port blocker installed on the mail
server. What server OS are you running?
James doesn't block ports in that way so I don't think James is the problem
here. Beware of local virus scanners on your PC which may hijack any
outgoing port 25 connections.
-- Jas
If you're willing to get your hands dirty in the code there is an RMI
proposal.
I have no idea what state it's in, but it would be cleaner than
telnet/screen scraping.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 April 2005 10:44
> To: James User
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 March 2005 21:26
> To: server-user@james.apache.org
> Subject: IMAP usage question
>
> Hi there,
>
> I notice that Geert Van Damme and Daniel Perry had some thoughts a few
> months ago on James' IMAP support,
I hope you know that the IMAP server is pre-alpha, which is a polite way of
saying nowhere near finished.
The version you are trying to compile has only in-memory support for mail
under IMAP, i.e. when you stop James you will *lose* all your mail if you
use the IMAP store.
I have a version that
At the moment,no.
If you wanted to do this you could write a matcher to catch the mail to all
users and then write a mailet to iterate over the user repository "sending"
the email to each user as you go.
What you match on is up to you. The LocaDelivery mailet code might be a good
place to start on
We use James in quite a few different environments (Win 2k, Win2k3, Solaris
8/9, Debian, RH9). Altought we don't do much POP delivery we have a test
system that gets hit with 50k emails/day, which results in it sending out
500k emails. Throughput is not an issue :) The box is an aging Dell P3
400Mh
Try http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00378.html
This does not give precise instructions, but it will point in the right
direction.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Milbratz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 August 2004 14:50
> To: 'James Users List'
> Subjec
James does nothing to attachments, unless you want to strip them.
This is most likely a problem with saving of the word doc from Outlook (or
whatever) and Word redoing the TOC because it feels like it.
I'm much more inclined to blame Word et al.
What version of Word is the document in, and what ve
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 June 2004 21:51
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: Using James with IIS
>
> MJ Kahn wrote:
> > The date stamp of James's Outgoing directory doesn't change when I
> > load that ASP page. Does that mea
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 May 2004 09:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: UK meetup
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't help noticing the relatively large number of .co.uk
> addresses on the James lists, and wondered if anyone else
>
In the LocalDelivery mailet in config.xml there is a section marked
.
Uncomment this block and provide with your ISP's mail server. The port
(25) should normally be unchanged
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 January 2004 20:48
>
At the moment, no.
There is a RMI based proposal, but I'm not sure what state that is in.
However that would be your best option for adding users programatically.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 January 2004 16:34
> To: [EMAIL
I don't think this is a James problem because James is not interested
in:
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
I would look very carefully at any other updates you have done to other
parts of your infrastructure, particularly the code that renders the
HTML. JavaMail is responsbile for that
Your are indeed correct :)
Try:
http://apache.mirrors.rossfell.co.uk/dist/jakarta/james/source/james-wit
h-phoenix-2.1.3-src.tar.gz
(picking a random mirror)
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Wooding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 January 2004 13:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc
Most source releases will come with phoenix.
Just build and go...
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Wooding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 January 2004 11:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'James Users List'
> Subject: RE: Suggested James (Mather/mailet) project
> directory layou
>
> Download the source! The directory stucture is included, as
> is build.xml. Run build.xml and it will identify any missing
> dependencies and download them too.
Except for JavaMail (http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/index.html)
and the Java Activiation Framework
http://java.sun.com/p
Personally, what we did (I wrote a commerical list manager using James)
is to use the matcher/mailet combo and use the mailet to write the mail
into a table of your own choosing. At least then you will have full
control over what get's written where (an how). If you use this method
you will not nee
I have now patched the source in CVS to fix this problem (no email about
it yet...)
However, to get this fix quickly you will need to pull down
branch_2_1_fcs using CVS and build James.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 Januar
Interesting, but unsuprising :)
I'll look at this tonight (I'm in GMT) and fix it.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Cavagnolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 January 2004 03:09
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Unix Mailbox Problem
>
>
> Late in December I got james 2.
You might want to set the mail state to GHOST in the exception handler
in your code (if you have one)
That way the message will get no further in the processing chain (I
think)
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 January 2004 14
Very likely.
Are you using the James database connection pooling or are you using
your own connection method?
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 December 2003 15:58
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: Sending an email with 100 CCs is very s
? If not, do I have to get the source from
> CVS? Is there a site describing how to check out the
> various development and test versions?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> --- Jason Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The current test release of James 2.2.0a (I
The current test release of James 2.2.0a (I think) can write to mbox
style user spools directly.
However it doesn't do Maildir (it will eventually I hope)
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Cavagnolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 December 2003 18:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Ray.
James and Sendmail use completely different spool files for spooling
incoming/outgoing mail.
But...
James can use mbox format mail boxes for storing user mail.
If your customer's user spools are already in mbox format then it's very
easy.
In the config.xml file just use:
It's not much fun, but it's not that hard either
It depends if you want to store just user email in it, or also store the
contents of the mail spool as well. The later is more difficult as it
requires more sophistication. I'd recommend you look at the JDBC
repostiory first.
If DBXML has a method of
; Is it in a usable yet or should I wait?
>
> Gili
>
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:08:26 +0100, Jason Webb wrote:
>
> >Yes it is.
> >I've got rather too much going on at the moment (personally and in
> >work), but work is still being done on it...
>
>
Yes it is.
I've got rather too much going on at the moment (personally and in
work),
but work is still being done on it...
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Gili [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 October 2003 00:31
> To: James-User Mailing List
> Subject: IMAP support, update?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 October 2003 10:55
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: Virus Protection Via Fast Fail
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hut,
>
> >Good Morning Everyone,
> Good afternoon matey ;-)
>
> >Have been combing through back e
This is what we do :)
All you need to do is add (or alter) /var/qmail/contol/smtproutes
testhost.inovem.com:10.0.0.13:26
Delivers all the mail to testhost.inovem.com to 10.0.0.13 on port 26
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 Octo
At the moment, no.
But we are working on it...
Darrell has written a working IMAP protocol stack, but this only
persists mail and users to memory.
I'm now writing (slowly) the code to integrate the current user and mail
system of James into the IMAP server.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
>
Hi Mateusz,
I've downloaded and run the current test release (2.2.0a12) and James
starts OK on both XP and RH 9.
Are you sure about the James version number?
James 1.2.2 is very old.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi has the current stable
release (2.1)
Or you can use http://cvs.apache.
elivery
mailet's gateway feature to deliver the email to one box only.
And as others have pointed out Microsoft SQL Server has the problems, not
MySQL
>
> Many Thanks Jason!
>
> Hut
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday
; server to host the JAMES databases or are they located on the
> same servers?
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Hut
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:22 PM
> To: 'James Users List'; [EMAI
Hi Hut.
We use a slightly different method to scale James onto multiple servers.
Two QMail servers work as a pair (we've used both DNS load balancing using
MX records or a load balancer) and then having the QMail boxes deliver to a
set of James servers. The James servers then use the QMail boxes as
fig.xml? Any clue?
Rgds,
Sriram
-Original Message-
From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 9:07 PM
To: 'James Users List'
Subject: RE: Knowing BCC addresses
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.org&msgId=997735
-
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.org&msgId=997735
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: sriram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 September 2003 14:29
> To: 'James Users List'
> Subject: Knowing BCC addresses
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an email in which ONLY "BCC"
The other we normally do is fix the mysql user so that the user can only
connect to a given db on a given host (e.g. maildb on localhost) and
that is the only way to connect to that db other than as root.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
We just use:
transmittedMessage.setHeader("Return-path", fullBounceAddress);
IIRC I had trouble using anything but setting the header explicitly.
Note that fullBounceAddress is not just a flat email address as it needs
to be surrounded by <> to be valid
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
>
56 matches
Mail list logo
