older
to point to the jar, but be careful of permissions. You may still hit the same errors I got after
you are able to connect. Double check the url as
jdbc:///;create=true
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 5, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Bill Warner wrote:
I'm in a similar situation, except I want to ke
I'm in a similar situation, except I want to keep docker and
docker-compose, but persist with mysql. I changed
james-database.properties, but queries throw a ClassNotFound exception
for com.mysql.jdbc.Driver.
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks --Bill
On 12/5/18 3:27 PM,
hello! http://tiffanygow.com/kroabwbz/odbnx/kcfok/znkk.html
Bill Pigg
I had the same problem. In my case I have a repository going to our
exchange server and I just dropped the object and stream files in there and
they took off. Not sure whether you can just drop them into the inbox or
not, but it's worth a try. You could make a processor to do always respool
stuf
Anyone know what actually is happening here. This just started on my office
and home servers. I've killed all spam processing until I figure out what
is going on. Is it really ORDB? I thought they died at the end of 2006.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Thrysøe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi there, see if anyone knows how to do this.
When a http request is sent to Tomcat, Tomcat manufactures a HTTPServletRequest
object based on the raw http request. HTTPServletRequest has easy method to
retrieve the request information, but I want to see the original raw request.
Is there a way
Gmail offers a POP3 download, but it is secured POP3 server using port 995. Is
there a way to use James FetchMail or FetchPOP to download email from gmail?
CB
-
Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
It is possible to turn on TLS/SSLsupport for James
SMTP server and POP3
server. If TLS/SSLin enabled on a POP server, then
the POP client need to
support TLS/SSL. I looked James FetchPOP and
FetchMail and found none of
them supports TLS/SSL, I assume both of them do not
work with Secured mail
I have some memory of running into that problem myself. I know my
installation is c:\apache\james-2.0.0. I think the same at home. Even
vaguer. I think an earlier install was in program files, but at some point
it broke. Vaguest: I think I remember reading about it somewhere and the
wording
I use both outlook (2000 office version) and thunderbird at home. Do the
same at work but no james client there as james feeds exchange. In both
cases outlook only talks to the local server (james or exchange) but
thunderbird goes to gmail, james, and my mail at the local isp. at work. I
hearti
This only rings a vague bell but I might have had this problem awhile back.
I don't think it ended up being James. I think my firewall was stripping
that out which was causing me problems signing up at sourceforge. Given
your problem seems internal this doesn't sound the same but thought I'd
sugg
need more detail. Is there something common that you can match on?
recepient, sender, ip, etc.
-Original Message-
From: david joffrin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 1:09 PM
To: server-user@james.apache.org
Subject: RE: Getting rid of those junk mails (i think th
If all problem emails are from your domain to your domain, you could put an
extra james server in there. The first talks to the outside and rejects
anything from your domain. Everything else is forwarded to the second
domain (the one you have now probably).
I didn't look at the matchers, but do
looks like my firewall is rejecting these, not james.
> -Original Message-
> From: bill page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:00 AM
> To: James Users List (E-mail)
> Subject: multiple domains
>
>
> I'm trying to add a second d
too large
Giving up on 24.225.231.115.
As I read the virtual table, that is not the issue. I don't care that it is
coming in on snakeriver, what I care about is that hillsborough-watchdog is
not working.
thanks
Bill Page
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Stefano! That appears to be the case.
--- Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good afternoon List,
> >
> > I'm having a heck of a time for suck a simple
> install.
> > I am rather rusty with classpaths and suspect that
> is where
> > the issue lies.
> >
> > Installed IBM Java
error:
java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: SHA
MessageDigest not available
whenever I attempt to adduser.
Suggestions?
Bill, not yet @pigg.net ;-)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yaho
Not sure if this is the same, but I use James at home and send mail to and
from my yahoo.id just as I can send mail pretty much anywhere. I use
Outlook.
bp
-Original Message-
From: Zare Ivanovic I [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:41 AM
To: James Users List
Subje
I use ordb.org to test
bp
-Original Message-
From: Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:21 PM
To: James Users List
Subject: Being used as a relay?
I am a newbie and I apologize up front and I know this is a JAMES email
list. But, I am running Solaris 9 x86 o
I go the other way around. mail comes in from the outside to James and it
forwards the mail to Exchange. I run a dns zone for the private IPs. This
all works fine for my situation.
Our application stuff goes to Exchange though as it is the only outbound
smtp server. James is inbound only.
bp
My firewall has a specific filter to allow/disallow pings. I thought that
was fairly common.
I can't interpret this very well but if I disallow outbound ping I get
03/28/05 16:37 firewalld[140]: deny out eth1:0 60 icmp 20 128 --
24.225.231.115 8 0 (Ping)
Note: - private internal
Sounds like you do want a java client.
You'll do all the stuff you talked about below and have your client connect
to the the stmp server (james or otherwise) to send that email. If you
wanted to say keep a database of addresses that you regularly sent these to
then I might still do it as a cli
done?
thanks
bill page
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Garden Software, Inc.
856 US Hwy 206 Bldg B Ste 6
Hillsborough, NJ 08844
908.904.0664
I don't do what you're doing, but I use James as a front end to Microsoft
exchange at work. I don't have the exchange emails there. I forward to
exchange before I hit the isRecipientLocal(?). If you really need to to
ensure that your users are the only ones that get through then you will need
to
:
Permanent exception delivering mail (Mail1097587130804-1-to-tusc.com: javax.ma
il.MessagingException: 501 5.5.4 Invalid Address
It almost appears as if exchange is rejecting the email, but
I am not sure why.
Bill Callahan
like James needs to be told to send the error
to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but shouldn't the return path header address that?
Bill Callahan
if you're mail matched either but not both then the two different matchers
would invoke the same mailet.
It sort of depends on what's going on, what your goals are, etc. The
matching emails could be dropped out of the current processor or not
depending on how you configure it (for ex if the mai
not sure what you're doing, but you probably don't need to. You can use the
two matchers independently. That could cause a second email depending on
the configuration. In that case use the two matchers to send the email to a
different processor and use the all matcher for your mailet.
bp
-
cond, I've seen a web page where the author says he ran james in weblogic
(and websphere), but didn't have any extra info. Where can I find more
details.
best regards,
bill milbratz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
pache
license. Is that what you mean? That the GPL requirement is too stringent?
thanks
bill page
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:49 PM
> To: James Users List
> Subject: RE: TNEF (winmail.dat) attachm
ear. I emailed them directly and was assured that I'd be off
which I was until the next newsletter. Finally I complained to their ISP.
That worked. Now I'm pretty sure that this is a legit company with no ill
intentions. I think they were just incompetent or didn't care enough to
Does anyone know of either
a matcher/mailet or some classes I could use to produce my mailet that strips
HTML? I've seen some references to linux / sendmail ones. I don't
really need to strip attachments as I strip all but zip files at the
firewall.
thanks
bill
page
1489)
thanks
bill page
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tch mail or pop. Both are the default configs. I
successfully upgraded a different environment from 2.1.3 to 2.2.0RC4 a
couple weeks ago and think I did pretty much the same thing.
thanks
bill page
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
> From: tobe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 6:15 PM
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: deploying user matchers
>
>
> Don't you have to write "digimatcher.RecipientIsAny=..." ?
>
> /tobe
>
> bill page wrote:
>
>
2.2? Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? If I comment out the matcher
(but leave the entry) the config works fine.
Bill Page
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noel;
how can you tell that an address is being managed by a dynamic DNS service?
thanks
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:33 PM
> To: James Users List
> Subject: RE: Outgoing mail frozen...
>
&
My understanding of the RFC is that the "mail.mydomain.com" record should
not be a CNAME. It should be an 'A' record. But, I think James supports
the CNAME. At least this is what I recall Noel telling me when I questioned
this.
bp
-Original Message-
From: bbrewer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
last i checked, james was not configured as an open relay by default. ask your
isp to show you the e-mail that they successfully relayed through it--me thinks
they are confusing *accepting* a message with *relaying* a message--james
accepts everything, but only passes on what makes it through th
Cadbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 2:55 AM
To: James Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: a very simple question..hope anyone/everyone can help
uh uh...thanx a lot bill...that kinda solve my question :D
which lead me to another question..do james delete the ema
question..hope anyone/everyone can help
uh uh...thanx a lot bill...that kinda solve my question :D
which lead me to another question..do james delete the email then? if not
where do james store them? cause I still need the emails although I don't
them to be processed further...
thanx again
Bill Page would like to recall the message, "a very simple question..hope
anyone/everyone can help".
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is it
you're trying to do that isn't accomplished by:
-Original Message-From: Cadbury
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:12
AMTo: James Users ListSubject: a very simple
question..hope anyone/everyone can help
hi all
here's my question. h
They are stored in flat files. For example my phred mailbox is:
\\Leela\C Drive\Apache\james-2.2.0RC4\apps\james\var\mail\inboxes\phred
while spam goes to:
\\Leela\C Drive\Apache\james-2.2.0RC4\apps\james\var\mail\spam
This can all be configured as you like. Those paths are default locations.
N
I recently move from 2.1.3 and don't have any problems. I'd recommend
merging the old config into the new one rather than the other way around.
OTOH if you can wait, maybe the release will come out this week.
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Perry [mailto:
one of the problems may be that some of the other lists were submitted to the
spamcop rbl list and i think that may have caused an inordinate amount of retries.
b
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Are there problems with this list today?
Just slow mail service. I guess people notice. LOL Lots of questio
Noel, I've been up on 2.2.0 RC3 for a few days now as you suggested. I'm
still having a problem with timeouts(?). To refresh your memory:
This is coming from a list. The message in question apparently has nulls at
the end. I think four, but I don't get to see them because of the problem.
I bel
Then I really screwed up. I gave you the list from the users directory.
These files were copies from the inbox
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 1:19 PM
> To: James Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: error upgradi
spaces
that reserved like the private spaces? But then, wouldn't they fail the DNS
lookup?
thanks
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 5:36 PM
> To: James Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Will do. A question though. These filenames are what is still in 2.1.3. I
just copied those over (as part of copying the var directory). Should I
have done something different?
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 1
765626D6173746572.Repository.FileObjectStore
7A78726167746F7073.Repository.FileObjectStore
bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
utableRunnable.j
ava:55)
at org.apache.james.util.thread.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:90)
Bill Page
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(UTC)
FILETIME=[38D43EC0:01C43841]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: Underwear, was Helmets
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1
Precedence: list
Reply
i have been seeing this a LOT lately:
$ host sbl.spamhaus.org
$
not sure how james behaves with the lack of response (as in the rbl
'doesn't exist'), but i am starting to think that the rbls are becoming
victims of their own success ;o)
b
Lahu wrote:
Hello Geniuses,
I an back wid a really pet
L PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also checked my firewall and it has two connections from from the 216.. ip
at that time.
bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s?
thanks
bill page
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g xxx but the message continues on because
of the billp. What I really want to do is to entirely kill the message if
any of my configured names (xxx in this case) are there.
bill page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Garden Software, Inc.
856 US Hwy 206 Bldg B
#x27;t
seen the beginning of thread. If you're having problems with all sorts of
servers, sounds like my comments may not be relevant although if some
senders work, then reviewing headers still might be worthwhile.
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: David Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
I used to have problems sort of like this between my home and work. Both
were exchange 5.5. If I sent to a yahoo id and then home, it would work. I
finally put specific filtering into my firewalls (both work and home) to
allow anything between my two servers. Since changing home to james I
have
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is something I can't explain. I can telnet to the
mailin-04.mx.aol.com address using microsoft's command
line telnet utility (the basic one) and issue commands,
but putty immediately disconnects saying the other side
closed the connection.
are you sure putty is using port 25?
Is that a bug? I thought an MX record had to reference a host record?
bill page
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 12:56 PM
> To: James Users List
> Subject: RE: Redirecting all incomming emails to anot
ne ip (which is
a natted private IP). Given that you can put up James in 1/2 hour, give it
a try.
hope that helps
bill page
> -Original Message-
> From: Lahu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: "Open-Relay&
AFAIK any *legitimate* relay server REQUIRES that a relay actually occur.
james--unless configured incorrectly--doesn't fit that profile.
heck, if you are paranoid about such thing (i am), here is a cron job for you
(requires wget):
#!/bin/sh
# wjp last updated 8/26/03
# first we query the rbls
actually, what immediately comes to mind for me is non-repudiation of
e-mail messages (finally! ;o)
b
Mark Swanson wrote:
On December 11, 2003 6:34 pm, bill parducci wrote:
if it takes off, it should make CPU salesmen around the world happy! :o)
I was curious so I fired up the ol' `op
Alain Ravet wrote:
> Are you using it for acceptance tests, or did you use for unit tests,
> while developing?
>
> Could you give a few numbers (rough estimates) : number of tests, time
> taken, setup time, ..
> Did you consider, at some point, using/writing mock servers to speed
> up some tests.
if it takes off, it should make CPU salesmen around the world happy! :o)
b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always thought server-driven domain-based authentication was one of the most needed additions to SMTP/email.
Does anyone know how we can learn more about this approach and make James compati
anecdotally, we have been using james for that for over a year now
(generic platform for proxying e-mail for analysis). it has worked quite
well. on the other hand 'fast' and 'small' are kinda relative ;o)
b
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 02:12, Alain Ravet wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm about to start developi
http://spambayes.org
it is the best thing out there'. there are a number of ways to implement
it. i currently get high 99% accuracy with it myself (and i am am lazy
with my training).
b
J Malcolm wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
If everyone is writing their own, that's fine. Is there a
Steve Brewin wrote:
> How can James be configured to "refuse service to DHCP pools".
> I guess I'm
> missing something as I cannot see anything that authoratively
> identifies an
> IP Address as a member of a DHCP pool.
by consulting with an 'rbl' provider (like spamhaus, etc.)
in a nutshell the
have you seen this:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?James/SmartOrSecondaryHost
i believe it is the general architecture you are looking for.
b
Brian C. Dilley wrote:
Hi, i'm working on an anti spam project (You've probably heard this
a million or more times) and i'm considerin
personally, i like this as a filter:
^[ ]*name\=\".*\.(pif|bat|scr|exe|vbs)\"
(kill 'em all! :o)
b
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How do you defend?
I use a regex matcher, and then if there is an attachment I block it.
I haven't tried it for this latest worm, but for other systems, someone had
sugg
Gregg Bolinger wrote:
192.168.1.1 is my linksys router.
192.168.1.101 is my mail server
hmm... that makes it kind tough. this obviously masks the responses from
the desitination server.
192.168.1.101.smtp > 192.168.1.1.2635: . ack 1378 win 7578 (DF)
192.168.1.1.2635 > 192.168.1.101.smtp: . ack 4
it appears that your james server is 192.168.1.1, but what is
192.168.1.101? is it the mail server for the domain you were trying to
send the note to or is it a smart host?
b
Gregg Bolinger wrote:
Ok Bill. Here is what I've got
21:47:24.871452 192.168.1.101.smtp > 192.168.1.1.263
Gregg Bolinger wrote:
I would assume I am opening a port because when I did that and sent
mail, I got a whole slew of information, mostly
IPADDRESS smtp > IPADDRESS . ack bla bla
If you need the exact text, I can provide that.
Thanks.
Gregg
the text would be helpful ;o). otherwise, try se
have you tried running `tcpdump port 25` on your box before attempting
to send a note? it would be interesting to see if you are opening a
socket on the remote server.
b
Gregg Bolinger wrote:
Ok, I am running Redhat 9. I have disabled all IPTables so I have no
firewall running. I have a ro
would you settle for deep shortstop? :o)
1. touche! critical is good, i surely don't mind. i want the best
solution possible. i appreciate the detail in which you have responded.
(i also appreciate the delivery--it is often hard to have a critical
technical discussion without making someone mad
looks like the ietf is trying to figure out how to leverage DNS to
provide simple domain authentication...
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-02.txt
who knows where it will end up but the general concept is appealing (and
easliy implementable).
b
---
What could would that do? I can take your entire message, replace the
contents with spam, and send it along. If we don't sign the contents, there
is no way to validate that *you* wrote them. As the receiver, I would query
the sender domain to make sure that it has a legitimate sender, but then a
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We could devise some other ad hoc server signed approach, or the IEFT
could put out an RFC tomorrow, but then we are still stuck with your
"network effect" objection. S/MIME is the only technology for which there
is ready MUA support.
right-o.
...and my point was that if we
cert(content) = signature
if you only sign the 'from' address it can be reused.
b
Serge Knystautas wrote:
bill parducci wrote:
if you don't sign the whole message this can be easily forged.
What do you mean? I'm talking about having the server use it's cert to
au
if you don't sign the whole message this can be easily forged.
b
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
Why not considering a different approach: if (i) SMTPAuth is on, and
(ii) the "From" user is the same as the SMTPAuth-enticated user, a
"Sign" mailet could sign the messag
these guys do this kind of stuff:
http://www.sigaba.com
AFAIK it is a variant of 'hey, did you just send me something?' using SAML.
for the most part any type of authentication solution is going to require
a single 'mx entity' to represent a given domain (something that can act
as the srouce of
82 matches
Mail list logo
