Hi all,
We want to support the real world users of James, even if you have never
posted here this is a chance to ensure you get what you need.
We're currently discussing the pros and cons of making Java 1.4+ a
requirement for a proposed future version of James.
Please take some time to consi
I'll be running 1.4+ anyway, so no problems here.
Eric
On Thursday 17 June 2004 02:21 am, Danny Angus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We want to support the real world users of James, even if you have never
> posted here this is a chance to ensure you get what you need.
>
> We're currently discussing the pr
> We're currently discussing the pros and cons of making Java 1.4+ a
> requirement for a proposed future version of James.
No problems here since Oracle has finally said that they will support OC4J
9.0.x on JDK 1.4.2_x on Solaris, according to our sysadmins. It would be
nice to have some support f
Hi Danny,
That would not cause problems for us. We are running all of our systems at
that level anyway.
Best regards,
Gerry Gattis
- Original Message -
From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 3:21 AM
Subject:
No problems here we run java 1.4 as our standard minimum jvm anyway and
I use it in our cusomt mailets... It would allow me to share the
mailets ;-)
Danny Angus wrote:
Hi all,
We want to support the real world users of James, even if you have never
posted here this is a chance to ensure you ge
