We've been running james3 in production for several months now. Had a
few issues but they turned out to be due to errors in our matchers,
mailets & config. Otherwise it's been working great.
Also did load testing last summer, pushing 20+ emails/sec each with
1MB attachment into james3 and could no
IMHO the main advantages are support for IMAP and "native" support for
virtual users/domains.
I don't think it is stable enough for production yet. I run an instance
of james3 as a pilot for 2 domains on my server. But the rest of the
domains that my box serves are on a 2.3.2 instance.
On 25/01/
Hello,
I would like to use James3 in production and i have few questions about it :
What are advantages to use James v3 vs James v2?
Does anybody uses James Beta3 in production already? Is it stable enough or
better use James 2.3.2?
When will final stable James 3 be released?
Thanks,
Mat.
I have James in production since 21 months (almost always running the
latest release under development), under Win2K on a 800MHz/512MB machine
that runs many other things. It handles about 2200-2300 messages per day
(incoming and outgoing) for about 230 users, with antivirus scan and
bayesian
James is very stable. We handle support from all these
sites and will therefore know when/if James is misbehaving in any way. Such
support calls are very rare.
--SÃren
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 16:57, Boon Seong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone used James in production environment ? Any
ll P3
400Mhz, 192Mb RAM running Win2k, ColdFusion, MS SQL and quite a few of your
services.
-- Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 November 2004 09:02
> To: James Users List
> Subject: Re: James in Production
>
> Me too.
>
Me too.
I've been using James for three years plus, I regularly receive
500-900 mails per day into a single account and access this via
outlook.
I've installed and maintained four production instances of James
serving about ten users each, each with similar volumes on each
account. Not to mention
> when I use mail client like Microsoft Outlook,it can not
> receive the new mail
More details would be required. I receive about 1000 e-mails daily from JAMES
to Outlook.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
ames is working fine, but Outlook is misconfigured.
Whatever the problem, you are not using James in a production environment.
Does this really position you to comment on the qualities of "James in
Production"?
-- Steve
-
... too soon to ask me for james production use case.
But without details your "james" problem could be more general (java
behaviour/performance related) problem.
First check logs if James has enough memory on java virtual machine heap
or not and java spits out Out Of Memory exceptions.
The oth
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18/11/2004 11:40
Please respond to "James Users List"
To:"James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: James in Production
> I am using James in
: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: James in Production
> I am using James in my production env,but feel very sorry for its
> reliability,and stability,I planned to changed it to Exchange or Qmail.
I find JAMES to be
> I am using James in my production env,but feel very sorry for its
> reliability,and stability,I planned to changed it to Exchange or Qmail.
I find JAMES to be quite stable and reliable.
> That's my private opionion for ur reference.
Well, actually it is your quite public opinion preserved in
or ur reference.
Regards
Milton
-Original Message-
From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2004-11-17 (ææä) 8:24
To: James Users List
Cc:
Subject: Re: James in Production
Boon Seong wrote:
I've
got james in production on two servers. (one version 2.1.3 one version
2.2.0)
The
2.1.3 server has been running since march (8 months without
reboot/restarting james) and i have had 0 problems. The 2.2.0 server
has been running since 2.2.0 was realeased and i've had 0
Boon Seong wrote:
Has anyone used James in production environment ? Any sample to quote ?
How's it reliability and stability ?
http://wiki.apache.org/james
--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e.
Hi,
Has anyone used James in production environment ?
Any sample to quote ?
How's it reliability and stability ?
Regards,
Boon Seong
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Just finally got around to writing that up yesterday, so glad I could
> use it so quickly. :)
It's an excellent document. Some of the views I bet are controversal, but
it does touch on all of the major points that I was thinking about.
> If you
Steve,
I've been running James in production, and have not had a problem. Spam is
more of an issue that DoS. And I limit the size of messages.
Besides which, what you consider DoS, someone else might consider a normal
load. I think it is more important for James to scale and de
Steven Job wrote:
Thank you for your quick response.
Just finally got around to writing that up yesterday, so glad I could
use it so quickly. :)
If I was to make a for loop (from i to 1,000,000) and
send a 10Mb file to people with email address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (steve1, steve2, steve3, etc).
W
Thank you for your quick response. I do see your points about Fast Fail
and see why it could hamper a spammer. But how are the benchmarks for
servers like this though. Would an ISP that accepts mail for thousands
of domains be able to use this in production though?
If I was to make a for loo
Steven Job wrote:
How does James work for large enterprise mail systems.
I was reading the following faq item.
http://james.apache.org/FAQ.html#2
It seems like this could be a problem on larger systems.
1) All spam will be delivered without verification upfront. This can
cause problems in that al
e owner of a
ford taurus instructions like.take the steel and heat it until it is in
liquid form then pour it into the cylinder mold...
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Job" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
How does James work for large enterprise mail systems.
I was reading the following faq item.
http://james.apache.org/FAQ.html#2
It seems like this could be a problem on larger systems.
1) All spam will be delivered without verification upfront. This can
cause problems in that all of this data w
24 matches
Mail list logo
