Alan,
This is for sanity check:
The updated hotspot webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8153749-Jigsaw-newcap.hs2/
Please, note that the *src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.hpp* was
corrected too.
Please, find the JVMTI spec here:
http:://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspit
On 4/14/16 13:00, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/04/2016 19:35, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
:
or it is about something like this:
"When can_generate_early_class_hook_events and
can_generate_all_class_hook_events
are enabled then this event may be sent in the primordial phase.
Otherw
On 14/04/2016 19:35, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
:
or it is about something like this:
"When can_generate_early_class_hook_events and
can_generate_all_class_hook_events
are enabled then this event may be sent in the primordial phase.
Otherwise, this event may be sent before the
On 4/14/16 06:53, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/04/2016 09:24, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Please, review the Jigsaw-related fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153749
Hotspot webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8153749-Jigsaw-newcap.hs1/
On 14/04/2016 09:24, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Please, review the Jigsaw-related fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153749
Hotspot webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8153749-Jigsaw-newcap.hs1/
Jdk webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/
Hi all,
Please review:
This moves jvmti object-tagging output to the tag-set
jvmti,objecttagging on debug level.
The TraceJVMTIObjectTagging argument is deprecated and aliased with:
"-Xlog:jvmti+objecttagging=debug"
Did this on top of:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-d
Hi all,
Please review:
This moves jvmti trace output to the tag jvmti on trace level.
The jvmti trace argument e.g. "-XX:TraceJVMTI=ec+ieost,all+ieost" have a
lot of functionality, e.g. can filter on func, in/out, etc, so it if
left as is.
TraceJVMTI enables jvmti trace to stdout if no othe
Thanks, Dmitry!
Serguei
On 4/14/16 02:24, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Serguei,
Looks good for me.
-Dmitry
On 2016-04-14 11:24, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Please, review the Jigsaw-related fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153749
Hotspot webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.ja
Serguei,
Looks good for me.
-Dmitry
On 2016-04-14 11:24, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
> Please, review the Jigsaw-related fix for:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153749
>
>
> Hotspot webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8153749-Jigsaw-newcap.
Alex,
Your fix has been pushed.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/12/16 14:56, Alex Henrie wrote:
2016-04-12 15:34 GMT-06:00 Daniel D. Daugherty :
I'm also good with the fix. At this point, I think everyone who
has commented on this fix previously has chimed in...
Yeah, this change shouldn't be controve
Please, review the Jigsaw-related fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153749
Hotspot webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8153749-Jigsaw-newcap.hs1/
Jdk webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2016/jdk/8153749-Jigsaw-newcap.jdk1/
Summ
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2016-04-13 22:49, Poonam Bajaj Parhar wrote:
Hello,
As per Erik's suggestion not to remove the existing check for
HS_ALT_MAKE, here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~poonam/8153252/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Poonam
On 4/11/2016 12:15 PM, Poonam Bajaj Par
Poonam,
Looks good for me!
-Dmitry
On 2016-04-13 23:49, Poonam Bajaj Parhar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As per Erik's suggestion not to remove the existing check for
> HS_ALT_MAKE, here is the updated webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~poonam/8153252/webrev.01/
>
> Thanks,
> Poonam
>
> On 4/11/20
13 matches
Mail list logo
