On 3/16/18 1:25 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thank you for taking care about this issue!
On 3/16/18 11:20, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi,
I've resolved the issues I had before with not seeing all the stderr
output when I tried to capture it. What I'd like to do now is have us
d
Hi Chris,
Thank you for taking care about this issue!
On 3/16/18 11:20, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi,
I've resolved the issues I had before with not seeing all the stderr
output when I tried to capture it. What I'd like to do now is have us
decide how the output should be handled from the perspec
Hi,
I've resolved the issues I had before with not seeing all the stderr
output when I tried to capture it. What I'd like to do now is have us
decide how the output should be handled from the perspective a
LingeredApp user (driver app). Currently all LingeredApp stdout is
captured and gets be
Hi Sundar,
I almost missed your mail, since you removed both me and build-dev from the cc
list...
> 16 mars 2018 kl. 06:14 skrev Sundararajan Athijegannathan
> :
>
> Renaming sawindbg as saproc sounds odd. For Linux, Solaris/Unix, we either
> use /proc & libproc, so calling saproc for those m
On 16/03/2018 9:49 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-03-16 04:13, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Overall this seems okay.
Thanks!
On 16/03/2018 4:22 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The saproc library has historically been built in quite odd ways on
almost all platforms. When the old buil
On 2018-03-16 04:13, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Overall this seems okay.
Thanks!
On 16/03/2018 4:22 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The saproc library has historically been built in quite odd ways on
almost all platforms. When the old build system was converted, this
was not changed.
H
On 16/03/2018 09:00, Hamlin Li wrote:
:
Just to confirm, have you run the serviceability and http client
tests to make sure that they compile with this change?
Yes, I ran tier1,tier2,tier3 tests(I think it includes httpclient
tests), and also specific tests using Utils.getFreePort in svc ar
On 16/03/2018 4:05 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/03/2018 01:54, Hamlin Li wrote:
:
Hi Alan,
Thank you for detailed reviewing. I have updated the webrev in place.
(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mli/8199215/webrev.00/)
Looks good, just a minor typo "is better choice" -> "is a better choice".
Hi
On 16/03/2018 01:54, Hamlin Li wrote:
:
Hi Alan,
Thank you for detailed reviewing. I have updated the webrev in place.
(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mli/8199215/webrev.00/)
Looks good, just a minor typo "is better choice" -> "is a better choice".
Just to confirm, have you run the serviceabilit
