On 2020/08/04 14:12, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 8/3/20 9:43 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 2020/08/04 12:18, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
I'm not sure yet. I'm waiting for a answer from the build support team. It
looks like some sort of sporadic build failure unrelated to your
On 8/3/20 9:43 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 2020/08/04 12:18, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
I'm not sure yet. I'm waiting for a answer from the build support
team. It looks like some sort of sporadic build failure unrelated to
your changes. Only one of several macosx builds
Hi Chris,
Looks good.
Yasumasa
On 2020/08/04 13:10, Chris Plummer wrote:
Ping!
On 7/27/20 10:04 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
I should have mentioned that currently there is no testing of this code. There will with the changes for [1]
JDK-8247514, which will add the lost clhsdb "whatis"
Hi Chris,
On 2020/08/04 12:18, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
I'm not sure yet. I'm waiting for a answer from the build support team. It
looks like some sort of sporadic build failure unrelated to your changes. Only
one of several macosx builds failed. You might just want to try to submit
Ping!
On 7/27/20 10:04 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
I should have mentioned that currently there is no testing of this
code. There will with the changes for [1] JDK-8247514, which will add
the lost clhsdb "whatis" functionality, which was lost when JavaScript
support went away. "whatis" used
Hi Yasumasa,
The changes look good.
thanks,
Chris
On 8/3/20 6:38 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comment!
I updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8250930/webrev.01/
This change produces infinite loop as below, it works fine.
1150: 8b 05
Hi Yasumasa,
I'm not sure yet. I'm waiting for a answer from the build support team.
It looks like some sort of sporadic build failure unrelated to your
changes. Only one of several macosx builds failed. You might just want
to try to submit the changes again.
thanks,
Chris
On 8/3/20 7:41
Submit repo reported build failure on macOS.
Can you share details?
Job: mach5-one-ysuenaga-JDK-8250930-1-20200804-0139-13140081
Thanks,
Yasumasa
On 2020/08/04 10:38, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comment!
I updated webrev:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your comment!
I updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8250930/webrev.01/
This change produces infinite loop as below, it works fine.
1150: 8b 05 ae 2e 00 00 mov0x2eae(%rip),%eax# 4004
Thanks Chris!
I will push it when I got second reviewer.
Yasumasa
On 2020/08/04 9:54, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
Your changes look good now.
thanks,
Chris
On 8/3/20 5:47 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thank you for the comment!
I updated webrev:
Hi Yasumasa,
Your changes look good now.
thanks,
Chris
On 8/3/20 5:47 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thank you for the comment!
I updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8250826/webrev.02/
Diff from webrev.01:
Hi Yasumasa,
Although I don't doubt that it works, calling fgetc() seems like an odd
way to resolve this issue. I had some internal discussions on how to
safely cause an infinite loop. Something like the following should work:
static volatile int dummy_counter = 0;
while (dummy_counter ==
Hi Chris,
Thank you for the comment!
I updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8250826/webrev.02/
Diff from webrev.01: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/submit/rev/e98dc25b69c2
On 2020/08/04 6:41, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Yasumasa,
Your updated fix resulted in using the core
Thanks Alex and Serguei!
On 8/3/20 4:46 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
LGTM++
Thanks,
Serguei
On 8/3/20 16:19, Alex Menkov wrote:
Hi Chris,
Looks good
--alex
On 08/03/2020 14:53, Chris Plummer wrote:
Ping! This is a fairly trivial testing fix to avoid timeouts when
Hi Chris,
LGTM++
Thanks,
Serguei
On 8/3/20 16:19, Alex Menkov wrote:
Hi Chris,
Looks good
--alex
On 08/03/2020 14:53, Chris Plummer wrote:
Ping! This is a fairly trivial testing fix to avoid timeouts when
using LingeredApp to generate a core dump. No knowledge of SA is needed.
thanks,
Hi Chris,
Looks good
--alex
On 08/03/2020 14:53, Chris Plummer wrote:
Ping! This is a fairly trivial testing fix to avoid timeouts when using
LingeredApp to generate a core dump. No knowledge of SA is needed.
thanks,
Chris
Forwarded Message
Subject: RFR(XXS): 8249150:
Thanks Kevin and Serguei!
Chris
On 8/3/20 2:51 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
LGTM++
Thanks,
Serguei
On 7/30/20 02:16, Kevin Walls wrote:
Hi Chris - Yes, that's a good discovery, looks good,
Thanks
Kevin
On 29/07/2020 21:08, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please help
Ping! This is a fairly trivial testing fix to avoid timeouts when
using LingeredApp to generate a core dump. No knowledge of SA is
needed.
thanks,
Chris
Forwarded Message
Subject:
Hi Chris,
LGTM++
Thanks,
Serguei
On 7/30/20 02:16, Kevin Walls wrote:
Hi Chris - Yes, that's a good discovery, looks good,
Thanks
Kevin
On 29/07/2020 21:08, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please help review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250750
Hi Yasumasa,
Your updated fix resulted in using the core file map whereas the
original fix used the library map. In both cases the assert is avoided,
which I think is the main goal. Does it matter which map is used?
42 #ifndef PF_R
43 #define PF_R 0x4
44 #endif
156 if ((map =
Dear Stefan,
May I ask your help to review again? I have made a delta based on the
last changeset you have reviewed(webrev04),hope it could ease your reviewing
work.
webrev:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lzang/jmap-8214535/8215624/webrev_10/
delta (vs webrev04):
21 matches
Mail list logo