On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:52:27 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>>
>> It allows for JIT optimizations based on es
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:05:57 GMT, Bob Vandette wrote:
>> @bobvandette Done in the latest version. Thoughts?
>
> I'm a little uncomfortable making such a dramatic change just to fix this
> small isolated problem. I think about all
> the churn we've had on these files and the backports to come.
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:06:58 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> OK. I'll probably fold JDK-8254001 into this one then.
>
> @bobvandette Done in the latest version. Thoughts?
I'm a little uncomfortable making such a dramatic change just to fix this small
isolated problem. I think about all
the chur
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 12:17:05 GMT, Erik Österlund wrote:
>> This PR the implementation of "JEP 376: ZGC: Concurrent Thread-Stack
>> Processing" (cf.
>> https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/376).
>> Basically, this patch modifies the epilog safepoint when returning from a
>> frame (supporting interpreter
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 04:28:16 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> Hi Serguei
>> (@sspitsyn)
>>
>> are you ok with the changes I made based on your comments?
>> Will you further review the change?
>>
>> Thanks, Richard.
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thank you for making the refactoring. I like it more now. :)
>
> Hi,
>
> this is the continuation of the review of the implementation for:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227745
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233915
>
> It allows for JIT optimizations based on escape analysis even if JVMTI agents
> acquire capabilities to access
> 8246774: implementing Record Classes as a standard feature in Java
Vicente Romero has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
removing unused jcod file
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/290/files
- new
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:08:13 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Yes. I've removed unused groups now, though.
>>
>> Originally, my thinking was that `mount root` and `mount path` would be
>> useful too so I kept it in. It would certainly
>> be useful for getting rid of reading `/proc/self/mountinfo`
> An issue similar to
> [JDK-8239559](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239559) has been
> discovered. On the
> affected system, `/proc/self/mountinfo` contains a line such as this one:
>
> 35 26 0:26 / /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime - cgroup
> systemd rw,name=sy
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 08:59:34 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemFactory.java
>> line 80:
>>
>>> 78: */
>>> 79: private static final Pattern MOUNTINFO_PATTERN =
>>> 80:
>>> Pattern.compile("^[^\\s]+\\s+[^\\s]+\\s+[^\\s]+\\s+([^
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 08:32:25 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemFactory.java
>> line 150:
>>
>>> 148: // find anyway in that case.
>>> 149: try (Stream mntInfo =
>>> CgroupUtil.readFilePrivileged(Paths.get(mountInfo)))
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:09:19 GMT, Adam Farley wrote:
> In the platform-specific implementations of linker_md.c, we see the
> dll_build_name methods begin with a call to
> jvmtiAllocate.
> We then appear to rush ahead and try to use that variable without checking
> for a null.
>
> I propose mov
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 12:18:39 GMT, Erik Österlund wrote:
>>> Hi Erik,
>>> Can you give an overview of the use of the "poll word" and its relation to
>>> the "poll page" please?
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing this code.
>>
>> There are various polls in the VM. W
13 matches
Mail list logo
