On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 19:05:57 GMT, Bob Vandette <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @bobvandette Done in the latest version. Thoughts? > > I'm a little uncomfortable making such a dramatic change just to fix this > small isolated problem. I think about all > the churn we've had on these files and the backports to come. Could you just > add a > CgroupSubsystemFactory::isValidSubsystem function which checks for cpuset, > cpuacct, memory, etc instead of the major > change? Thanks for having a look! Sure, we could do that instead. I'm not sure this is the best solution going forward, though. Thinking about JDK 17... Anyway, I'll look into a more conservative fix. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/485
