Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
-
Commit messages:
- [PATCH] Change nested classes in jdk.jconsole to static nested classes
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5974/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=
Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
-
Commit messages:
- [PATCH] Change nested classes in jdk.jdi to static nested classes
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5978/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=5978&
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 20:32:43 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5974
> Greetings,
>
> Object.finalize() was deprecated in JDK9. There is an ongoing effort to
> replace and mitigate Object.finalize() uses in the JDK libraries; please see
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8253568 for more information.
>
> We also like to assist users in replacing and mit
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 20:32:43 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5974
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 17:28:37 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5978
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:43:13 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1afddb25
Author:Andrey Turbanov
Committer: Daniel Fuchs
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/j
Hi,
A new param named 'size' was added to
sharedRuntime::dtrace_object_alloc/dtrace_object_alloc_base
in JDK-8039904("dtrace/hotspot/Monitors/Monitors001 fails with "assert(s > 0)
failed: Bad size calculated").
But in some places where these two functions are called, this new parameter is
not
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 20:32:43 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
Marked as reviewed by mchung (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5974
On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:23:35 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Object.finalize() was deprecated in JDK9. There is an ongoing effort to
>> replace and mitigate Object.finalize() uses in the JDK libraries; please see
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8253568 for more info
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:42:58 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Markus Grönlund has updated the pull request incrementally with three
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - localize
>> - cleanup
>> - FinalizerStatistics
>
> test/jdk/jdk/jfr/event/runtime/TestFinalizerStatisticsEvent.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:45:54 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Markus Grönlund has updated the pull request incrementally with three
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - localize
>> - cleanup
>> - FinalizerStatistics
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/ref/Finalizer.java lin
> Greetings,
>
> Object.finalize() was deprecated in JDK9. There is an ongoing effort to
> replace and mitigate Object.finalize() uses in the JDK libraries; please see
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8253568 for more information.
>
> We also like to assist users in replacing and mit
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 22:31:18 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Markus Grönlund has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> no precompiled headers and mtServiceability nmt classification
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> It's a little surprised to see Fin
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 19:47:26 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Object.finalize() was deprecated in JDK9. There is an ongoing effort to
> replace and mitigate Object.finalize() uses in the JDK libraries; please see
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8253568 for more informatio
This reverts commit 31500692d1503cb73249e0425e693049258a.
-
Commit messages:
- JDK-8275436 [BACKOUT] JDK-8271949 dumppath in -XX:FlightRecorderOptions does
not affect
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5994/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&p
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:14:16 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> This reverts commit 31500692d1503cb73249e0425e693049258a.
>
> Thanks for creating the backout Dan, looks good.
@mgronlun - Thanks for the fast review!
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5994
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:58:25 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
> This reverts commit 31500692d1503cb73249e0425e693049258a.
Thanks for creating the backout Dan, looks good.
-
Marked as reviewed by mgronlun (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5994
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:58:25 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty
wrote:
> This reverts commit 31500692d1503cb73249e0425e693049258a.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: a03119ce
Author:Daniel D. Daugherty
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/a03119ce1a34642565c669
> This change fixes deadlocks described in the JBS-bug by:
>
> * Releasing `handlerLock` before waiting on `threadLock` in
> `blockOnDebuggerSuspend()`
>
> * Notifying on `threadLock` in `threadControl_reset()`
>
> Also the actions in handleAppResumeBreakpoint() are moved/deferred until
> doPen
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:52:09 GMT, Richard Reingruber wrote:
>
>
> Hm, I think this can be simplified by swaping blockOnDebuggerSuspend() and
> trackAppResume(). Can't try it today but will on Monday.
I've done that with commit
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/5849/commits/0b0fef0e6670c20a
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 17:28:37 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> Non-static classes hold a link to their parent classes, which can be avoided.
Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5978
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:22:40 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Hey Chris, is there any update on this? I've revised the Problem section so
>> I think we're waiting on the CSR ticket to be updated accordingly and for
>> someone to be assigned for the CSR review.
>
>> Hey Chris, is there any update o
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:22:40 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Hey Chris, is there any update on this? I've revised the Problem section so
>> I think we're waiting on the CSR ticket to be updated accordingly and for
>> someone to be assigned for the CSR review.
>
>> Hey Chris, is there any update o
24 matches
Mail list logo