On 18/05/2020 10:08, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review this 8u backport of JDK-8150986. It's a clean backport
> except for the copyright change. In the 8u252 cycle JDK-8144732 got
> backported which now makes the test fail.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150986
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 12:01, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> On 1/3/19 11:24 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8216058
> > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8216058/webrev.01/
> >
> > Testing: Failing VersionCheck.java prior the patch, pass
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 16:59, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 16:56 +, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 12:15, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 06:46 +, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 12:15, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 06:46 +, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:19, Severin Gehwolf
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:49 +, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > > &g
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:19, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:49 +, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > Ok, I presume that's not a change you're also going to make in
> > OpenJDK 12?
>
> Yes. I don't intend to change this in JDK 12. JDK 8
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:28, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 16:18 +, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 14:10, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can I get a review of this small 8u enhancement,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 14:10, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can I get a review of this small 8u enhancement, please? It adds two
> new launchers for the serviceability agent, one CLI version and one GUI
> version:
>
> $ /bin/clhsdb
> $ /bin/hsdb
>
> The enhancement request has been approved h
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 10:20, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 06:47 +, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 15:39, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> >
> > snip...
> >
> > >
> > > Two reasons: (1) JDK-8140482 isn't a smal
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 15:39, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
snip...
>
> Two reasons: (1) JDK-8140482 isn't a small change. (2) The patch
> doesn't apply cleanly[1] from JDK 9 so would be some work to get the
> pre-requisite in.
>
> It appears the code is already out of sync and the risk would be higher
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140482
Original changeset:
https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk-updates/jdk9u/hotspot/rev/cd86b5699825
Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk8/8140482/webrev.01/
The patch largely applies as is, with some adjustment for context and
the droppin
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 16:02, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody please review this 8u backport of 8210836 as I'd like to
> get 8210647 (opt for sa) backported to 8u as well? Unfortunately the
> change from JDK 12 doesn't apply cleanly so I've included select
> changes from 8140482 s
- Original Message -
>
> On 22/01/16 15:58, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> >Yes - please fix this issue in JDK 9 first as per rule 1:
> >> >http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/groundrules.html
> >> >
> >> >In a nutshell, produ
- Original Message -
> On 22/01/16 14:50, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 21/01/16 15:20, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> >>> Thanks, Jaroslav. Any JDK 8 reviewer willing to have a look at this?
> >> Looks good to me Severi
- Original Message -
> Hello all!
>
> I'm working with a GSoC student adding dtrace probe support to JRuby,
> and ran into the issue that user-defined dtrace probes only work on
> Solaris. So I started poking around hotspot source and found that both
> the linux and bsd JSDT sources are em
- Original Message -
> Thanks for the patch, I think it sounds like a good idea. For consistency,
> however, we need to do the same modifications to the other platforms
> (solaris, windows) and preferably add tests for this functionality as well.
>
The patch makes sense to me.
While a ve
- Original Message -
> Greetings,
>
> I have a fix for the following Linux specific FDS bug:
>
> 7188168 4/4 7071904 broke the DEBUG_BINARIES option on Linux
>
> Here is the URL for the webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7188168-webrev/0/
>
> What the
- Original Message -
> On 3/23/12 12:08 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> Greetings,
> >>>
> >>> I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's the webrevs:
> >
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7u6-root/
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7
- Original Message -
> Greetings,
>
> I've backported the FDS changes to JDK7u6. Here's the webrevs:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7u6-root/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/fds_revamp/7136506-webrev/0-7u6-jdk/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/
- Original Message -
> * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-02 10:09]:
> > - Original Message -
> > > * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > > >
- Original Message -
> * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
> > - Original Message -
> > > * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > > > The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the
> > > > build, I'm n
- Original Message -
> * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the
> > build, I'm not sure.
> > They may have only been supplied as documentation on how to build
> > the native code.
> >
> > Deleting the -mimpure-text is probably ri
- Original Message -
> On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
> >> While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that simply
> >> deleting the sparc-only option unconditionally is the right thing
> >> to
> >> do.
> >>
> >
> > I thought ab
23 matches
Mail list logo
