On 6/12/20 17:22, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Hi Serguei,
Thanks for reviewing! I pushed the changeset just before I took a dinner
break
Great!
so I won't be able to list you as a reviewer.
Not a big deal. :)
Thanks,
Serguei
Dan
On 6/12/20 6:40 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Serguei,
Thanks for reviewing! I pushed the changeset just before I took a dinner
break so I won't be able to list you as a reviewer.
Dan
On 6/12/20 6:40 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Dan and Chris,
Problem-listing it for Xcomp only looks right to me.
Thank you for taking care
Hi Dan and Chris,
Problem-listing it for Xcomp only looks right to me.
Thank you for taking care about it!
Thanks,
Serguei
On 6/12/20 14:20, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 1:59 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 4:48 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 12:13 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty
On 6/12/20 5:20 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 1:59 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 4:48 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 12:13 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:58 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 11:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:49 PM, Chris
On 6/12/20 1:59 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 4:48 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 12:13 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:58 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 11:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:49 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Dan,
What's the
On 6/12/20 4:48 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 12:13 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:58 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 11:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:49 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Dan,
What's the criteria for "noise".
There is no specific criteria
On 6/12/20 12:13 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:58 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 11:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:49 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Dan,
What's the criteria for "noise".
There is no specific criteria that I'm aware of.
It popped up in
On 6/12/20 2:58 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
On 6/12/20 11:52 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/12/20 2:49 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Dan,
What's the criteria for "noise".
There is no specific criteria that I'm aware of.
It popped up in today's JDK15 testing so it got on my radar (again).
Yumin,
Thanks for the review!
Dan
On 6/12/20 2:51 PM, Yumin Qi wrote:
Hi, Dan
Looks good to me and it is trivial.
Thanks
Yumin
On 6/12/20 11:40 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Tap, tap, tap... is this thing working?
Anyone out there? This is a trivial 1-liner review...
Dan
On
Hi Dan,
What's the criteria for "noise". I don't consider the failures for this
test as noisy. I only see 3 in mach5 CI testing for all of JDK 15. JDK
14 does appear to have been somewhat noisy, possibly enough so that it
looks like maybe something changed to reduce the number of failures in
Hi, Dan
Looks good to me and it is trivial.
Thanks
Yumin
On 6/12/20 11:40 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Tap, tap, tap... is this thing working?
Anyone out there? This is a trivial 1-liner review...
Dan
On 6/12/20 12:46 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
It's time to reduce
Tap, tap, tap... is this thing working?
Anyone out there? This is a trivial 1-liner review...
Dan
On 6/12/20 12:46 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Greetings,
It's time to reduce the noise in the CI so I'm ProblemListing tests.
Here's the bug for failure:
JDK-8205957
Greetings,
It's time to reduce the noise in the CI so I'm ProblemListing tests.
Here's the bug for failure:
JDK-8205957 setfldw001/TestDescription.java fails with bad field value
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205957
and here's the bug for the ProblemListing:
13 matches
Mail list logo
