thanks, i'll push it as soon as I get full test results (assuming there are no
new failures).
-- Igor
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:21 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> This update looks good too.
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 4/27/20 22:12, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Thanks Mikael,
>>
>>
This update looks good too.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/27/20 22:12, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Thanks Mikael,
there is, thought, one more test failing after 8243928 --
serviceability/jvmti/CanGenerateAllClassHook/CanGenerateAllClassHook.java. the
fix is pretty much the same revert part of 8243928:
Hi Serguei,
thanks for review, no I haven't yet as I found another problem w/ 8243928.
-- Igor
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:14 PM, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Hi Igor,
>
> Looks good but you have already pushed. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 4/27/20 22:10, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Hi Igor,
Looks good but you have already pushed. :)
Thanks,
Serguei
On 4/27/20 22:10, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
Looks good, thanks for the quick turnaround!
Cheers,
Mikael
On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:02 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243946/webrev.00
2 lines
Thanks Mikael,
there is, thought, one more test failing after 8243928 --
serviceability/jvmti/CanGenerateAllClassHook/CanGenerateAllClassHook.java. the
fix is pretty much the same revert part of 8243928:
> diff -r 67cbcf4f
>
Looks good and trivial.
Thanks,
David
On 28/04/2020 3:02 pm, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243946/webrev.00
2 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod;
Hi all,
(so now it's my time to apology for inconvenience)
could you please review this small follow-up
Looks good, thanks for the quick turnaround!
Cheers,
Mikael
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:02 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243946/webrev.00
>> 2 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod;
>
> Hi all,
>
> (so now it's my time to apology for inconvenience)
>
>
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8243946/webrev.00
> 2 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod;
Hi all,
(so now it's my time to apology for inconvenience)
could you please review this small follow-up fix/partial revert of 8243928[1]?
serviceability/sa/TestCpoolForInvokeDynamic.java and
