There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the tests
for this should not execute when ZGC is enabled.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214484
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8214484/webrev.0
/Per
On 11/29/18 4:07 PM, Per Liden wrote:
> There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the tests for
> this should not execute
> when ZGC is enabled.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214484
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8214484/webrev.0
Looks good.
On 11/29/18 4:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:07 PM, Per Liden wrote:
There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the tests for this
should not execute
when ZGC is enabled.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214484
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~p
On 11/29/18 4:34 PM, Per Liden wrote:
> On 11/29/18 4:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 11/29/18 4:07 PM, Per Liden wrote:
>>> There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the tests for
>>> this should not execute
>>> when ZGC is enabled.
>>>
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.n
Hi,
On 11/29/18 4:48 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:34 PM, Per Liden wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:07 PM, Per Liden wrote:
There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the tests for this
should not execute
when ZGC is enabled.
B
On 11/29/18 5:26 PM, Per Liden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/29/18 4:48 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 11/29/18 4:34 PM, Per Liden wrote:
>>> On 11/29/18 4:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:07 PM, Per Liden wrote:
> There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the t
Hi Per,
I think there may have been some discussion about this before. Are there
plans to eventually get SA heap walking support for ZGC, and is the list
of disabled tests being maintained somewhere?
thanks,
Chris
On 11/29/18 7:07 AM, Per Liden wrote:
There's no support for SA heap walking
Hi Chris, Per,
Shenandoah has the same problem, for the same reasons. And I'm not
convinced that G1 is safe either, at least with
-XX:+ClassUnloadingWithConcurrentMark.
In my opinion, this whole code section needs to be rewritten to use
something like CollectedHeap::object_iterate() (which is use
On 2018-11-29 17:40, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/29/18 5:26 PM, Per Liden wrote:
Hi,
On 11/29/18 4:48 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:34 PM, Per Liden wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:17 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 11/29/18 4:07 PM, Per Liden wrote:
There's no support for SA heap walk
Hi Chris,
On 2018-11-29 20:04, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Per,
I think there may have been some discussion about this before. Are there
plans to eventually get SA heap walking support for ZGC, and is the list
of disabled tests being maintained somewhere?
The latest directive I've received is t
On 11/29/18 1:28 PM, Per Liden wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 2018-11-29 20:04, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hi Per,
I think there may have been some discussion about this before. Are
there plans to eventually get SA heap walking support for ZGC, and is
the list of disabled tests being maintained somewhere?
Hi,
On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 16:07 +0100, Per Liden wrote:
> There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the
> tests
> for this should not execute when ZGC is enabled.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214484
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8214484/web
Thanks for reviewing, Thomas!
/Per
On 11/30/18 1:53 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 16:07 +0100, Per Liden wrote:
There's no support for SA heap walking when using ZGC. Hence the
tests
for this should not execute when ZGC is enabled.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/bro
13 matches
Mail list logo
