On 12/05/2014 02:19 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 3/12/2014 1:51 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 12/02/2014 10:37 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 1/12/2014 7:16 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 09:33 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 01:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:
On 3/12/2014 1:51 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 12/02/2014 10:37 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 1/12/2014 7:16 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 09:33 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 01:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:57 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, revi
On 12/02/2014 10:37 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 1/12/2014 7:16 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 09:33 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 01:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:57 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bu
On 1/12/2014 7:16 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 09:33 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 01:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:57 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064441
Webrev
On 11/27/2014 09:33 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 11/27/2014 01:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:57 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064441
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8064441/
On 11/27/2014 01:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
On 26/11/2014 10:57 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064441
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8064441/webrev.00
The test fails because of System.out.pr
On 26/11/2014 10:57 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064441
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8064441/webrev.00
The test fails because of System.out.println() may induce unexpected
locking. The so
Jaroslav,
The fix looks good.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 11/26/14 4:57 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064441
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8064441/webrev.00
The test fails because of System.out.p
Looks good!
Erik
Jaroslav Bachorik skrev 2014-11-26 13:57:
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064441
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8064441/webrev.00
The test fails because of System.out.println() may induce unexpected
lo
Please, review the following test change
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064441
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8064441/webrev.00
The test fails because of System.out.println() may induce unexpected
locking. The solution is to use an already existing LockFreeLogM
10 matches
Mail list logo