Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-02-01 Thread Rickard Bäckman
Thanks for the review, David. /R On Feb 1, 2013, at 7:59 AM, David Holmes wrote: On 1/02/2013 4:54 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote: That was the idea. However, can I have Ok for checking this into hs24 while waiting? Sorry - ignore the hs25 comment - been looking at too many JDK review

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-31 Thread Rickard Bäckman
That was the idea. However, can I have Ok for checking this into hs24 while waiting? Thanks /R On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:33 PM, David Holmes wrote: On 22/01/2013 12:09 AM, Rickard Bäckman wrote: Yes, that code has changed. Checked in to hs24. Okay but this is a review for hs25 ;-) So I assume

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-31 Thread David Holmes
On 1/02/2013 4:54 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote: That was the idea. However, can I have Ok for checking this into hs24 while waiting? Sorry - ignore the hs25 comment - been looking at too many JDK review requests. Yes this seems fine for hs24. David Thanks /R On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:33 PM,

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-21 Thread David Holmes
On 22/01/2013 12:09 AM, Rickard Bäckman wrote: Yes, that code has changed. Checked in to hs24. Okay but this is a review for hs25 ;-) So I assume that change will be there real soon now. :) David /R 21 jan 2013 kl. 02:59 skrev David Holmesdavid.hol...@oracle.com: On 18/01/2013 11:45

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-20 Thread David Holmes
On 18/01/2013 11:45 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote: Aleksey, thanks for your review! a) It was before on of my own changes used in os_solaris.cpp (I think, for synchronization support for Suspend/Resume). I don't think we wanted something external to mess with that lock. Seems to be used here:

Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-18 Thread Rickard Bäckman
Hi all, would some please review the following change? With recent changes in hs24 the ProfileVM_lock is no longer in use. This small change set removes the lock. The changes that lead to this is also on their way into hsx, but are not yet there. If that change would go into hsx without this

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-18 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On 01/18/2013 04:58 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/8006563/ Looks good to me (not a Reviewer), modulo: a) Are we sure this thing is not acquired in some weird way, i.e. through JVMTI, SA, or whatnot? b) The formatting of the predicate does not follow it's

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-18 Thread Rickard Bäckman
Aleksey, thanks for your review! a) It was before on of my own changes used in os_solaris.cpp (I think, for synchronization support for Suspend/Resume). I don't think we wanted something external to mess with that lock. b) I've changed the indentation slightly. Updated webrev at

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-18 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On 01/18/2013 05:45 PM, Rickard Bäckman wrote: b) I've changed the indentation slightly. Updated webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/8006563.2/ (or at least currently copying…) Thumbs up. -Aleksey.

Re: Request for review (XS): 8006563: Remove unused ProfileVM_lock

2013-01-18 Thread Staffan Larsen
Looks good! /Staffan On 18 jan 2013, at 14:45, Rickard Bäckman rickard.back...@oracle.com wrote: Aleksey, thanks for your review! a) It was before on of my own changes used in os_solaris.cpp (I think, for synchronization support for Suspend/Resume). I don't think we wanted something