Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v5]

2024-01-05 Thread Denghui Dong
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:22:45 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of >> FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. >> >> Thanks. > > Denghui Dong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v5]

2024-01-05 Thread Stefan Karlsson
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:22:45 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of >> FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. >> >> Thanks. > > Denghui Dong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v5]

2024-01-04 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 02:24:44 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: >>> It means that either Serial is set (and available) or it can be set >> >> @stefank that is subtle - and unintuitive. Thanks for explaining. > > @dholmes-ora Thanks for the review. > > This change only involves the test part. Do I need a

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v5]

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 20:37:39 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >>> > For this test I think we can just add @requires vm.gc.Serial >>> >>> @stefank but it doesn't require that, it explicitly sets that. The test >>> requires that no specific GC has been requested. >> >> @dholmes-ora `@requires

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v5]

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
> Hi, > > Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of > FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. > > Thanks. Denghui Dong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: update copyright -

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v4]

2024-01-04 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:47:48 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of >> FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. >> >> Thanks. > > Denghui Dong has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v4]

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 00:47:48 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of >> FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. >> >> Thanks. > > Denghui Dong has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v4]

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
> Hi, > > Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of > FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. > > Thanks. Denghui Dong has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v3]

2024-01-04 Thread David Holmes
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:54:50 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote: > It means that either Serial is set (and available) or it can be set @stefank that is subtle - and unintuitive. Thanks for explaining. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17263#issuecomment-1877728970

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v3]

2024-01-04 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:37:33 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of >> FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. >> >> Thanks. > > Denghui Dong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v3]

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:06:26 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: > We're up to 48 test failures so far (8 x 6 Tier3 buildIDs) which is very, > very noisy. Since it looks like this PR is still being discussed, I'm going > to ProblemList this test in order to get the noise level back down. sorry for

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v3]

2024-01-04 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:37:33 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of >> FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. >> >> Thanks. > > Denghui Dong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v3]

2024-01-04 Thread Stefan Karlsson
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:56:45 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > > For this test I think we can just add @requires vm.gc.Serial > > @stefank but it doesn't require that, it explicitly sets that. The test > requires that no specific GC has been requested. @dholmes-ora `@requires vm.gc.Serial` doesn't

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v3]

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
> Hi, > > Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of > FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. > > Thanks. Denghui Dong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: update - Changes: -

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails [v2]

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
> Hi, > > Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of > FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. > > Thanks. Denghui Dong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: update - Changes: -

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:01:57 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: > Hi, > > Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of > FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. > > Thanks. And for this test, I think `@requires vm.opt.DisableExplicitGC != "true"` is also needed.

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:01:57 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: > Hi, > > Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of > FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. > > Thanks. I found other tests that set -XX:+UseSerialGC explicitly have `@requires vm.gc.Serial` or

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails

2024-01-04 Thread David Holmes
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:01:41 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote: > For this test I think we can just add @requires vm.gc.Serial @stefank but it doesn't require that, it explicitly sets that. The test requires that no specific GC has been requested. - PR Comment:

Re: RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails

2024-01-04 Thread Stefan Karlsson
On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:01:57 GMT, Denghui Dong wrote: > Hi, > > Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of > FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. > > Thanks. I prefer if we stay away from using `@requires vm.flagless` if possible. For this test I think

RFR: 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails

2024-01-04 Thread Denghui Dong
Hi, Please help review this patch that fixes the failures of FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java caused by passing other gc flags. Thanks. - Commit messages: - 8322989: New test serviceability/HeapDump/FullGCHeapDumpLimitTest.java fails Changes: